The Low Income Housing Tax Credit for Nonprofits Developing Rural Rental Housing

The Low Income Housing Tax Credit for Nonprofits Developing Rural Rental Housing

INTRODUCTION

The Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) provides an incentive for private, profit-motivated entities to develop affordable housing. Structuring a development project to use the tax credit is complex, but may well be worthwhile. This information sheet provides only very brief introductory material about the tax credit. To evaluate potential tax credit funding for a specific project, perform detailed calculations, carry out the syndication process, develop a project and then manage it, the would-be developer will want not only to learn more about the tax credit but also to acquire the services of experts such as an accountant, an attorney and perhaps a syndicator.

PROGRAM BASICS

The LIHTC, adopted by Congress in the 1986 Tax Reform Act, is a reduction in the dollar amount of federal taxes owed by an individual or corporation, in exchange for his/her/its investment in low-income rental housing. The amount of tax reduction is tied directly to the proportion of low-income persons among the residents of the housing produced. To obtain the tax reduction, an investor provides the cash – called capital or equity in development terms – that will be used to help develop the project. The investor has no role in the development process or the management of the project after it is rented up. A for-profit or nonprofit developer does those tasks. The investor receives a tax credit paid annually over a 10-year period and cannot withdraw his/her/its investment for 15 years.

ELIGIBLE ACTIVITIES

The tax credit program provides funding for two types of rental housing development: construction of new buildings or substantial rehabilitation of existing buildings. New construction can produce single-family houses, apartment buildings, duplexes, rowhouses or townhouses. Rehabilitation can be performed on these same types of buildings, and conversion of structures like warehouses, schools and motels is also possible.

PROJECT REQUIREMENTS

The value of the tax credit depends on the type of financing used. A larger credit is provided for development that does not use federal financing (except for the HOME program in some situations). For projects with federal financing, the tax credit is approximately 4 percent of development cost, excluding land; for projects without federal financing, it is approximately 9 percent.

A tax credit project can be partly occupied by households that are not low-income. However, the incentive is structured to encourage low-income occupancy by increasing the amount of credit for a higher proportion of low-income residents or for lower incomes of the residents. The tax credit provides investment benefits only for the amount of investment attributable to the portion of the building occupied by low-income tenants.

The project must comply with the chosen income levels, and with certain rent limitations, for at least 15 years. Because the tax credit’s benefits are tied directly to the characteristics of the tenants, management of a tax credit project throughout the credit’s 15-year term is a vitally important function. Of course, if a project receives financing from a program or a lender that imposes stricter tenant income requirements or longer use restrictions, it must comply with those provisions as well as the LIHTC provisions.

While the investors’ benefits from the Low Income Housing Tax Credit are provided by the Internal Revenue Service, states bear most of the responsibility for administering the tax credit program itself. Each state must set aside at least 10 percent of its credit allocation for projects developed by nonprofits.

Syndication is the process of selling the tax credits to investors and thus raising capital for a project. The nonprofit developer that holds the tax credit allocation can solicit the market for the best price and terms to generate cash for project development. Most often, investors or investor funds will seek out the holder of the tax credit instead. A syndicator may be contacted by either party and works as a professional to bring investors and nonprofit developers together. A nonprofit – particularly one that has served as a general partner in a tax credit deal – may receive calls from syndicators or potential investors looking for general partners and tax credit projects.

BENEFITS FOR NONPROFITS

Nonprofits are exempt from paying income taxes, so the tax-related values of the tax credit are meaningless to them. However, there are other benefits for a nonprofit organization in a tax credit project, including:

  • opportunity to develop the project – the tax credit brings to the development process various players that might not otherwise come together, assisting nonprofit groups that do not have staff knowledge, capacity or seed capital to develop a project alone;
  • leverage for financing;
  • fees for the organization to cover overhead costs – once a property is developed and syndicated, the general partner (the nonprofit) should receive a developer’s fee, a property management fee (if it manages the property), a partnership management fee and an incentive management fee;
  • opportunity for project ownership – usually the nonprofit developer will have an option to purchase the project at the end of the 15-year tax credit compliance period, creating permanently affordable housing;
  • publicity to help raise funds; and
  • opportunity for property management.

RISKS FOR NONPROFITS

Like any development process, the tax credit market involves risk. For example:

  • A syndicator representing funds that are not yet sold to investors may provide a verbal commitment but not be able to carry through with the arrangement.
  • There are standard risks associated with any real estate deal. The strength of the real estate market, the financial viability of the nonprofit developer, the experience of the developer and other factors can determine the pricing a nonprofit group will receive.
  • Poor forecasting could result in inadequate revenues to carry debt service, leading to project decline or foreclosure and thus to loss of the tax credit.
  • Uninsured losses such as natural disasters could destroy the property and with it the tax credit.
  • If the rate of low-income tenancy changes, the tax credit could be lost or tax credits could be recaptured.

Some risks can be avoided by an experienced attorney and/or consultant making sure the partnership is properly set up. The partnership agreement should include provisions about title insurance, fire and casualty insurance, contractor bonding, vacancy limits, guarantees and other language that generally minimizes risk.

FOR MORE INFORMATION

A good introduction to the basics of the tax credit and its use in rural areas is Utilizing the Low Income Housing Tax Credit for Rural Rental Projects: A Guide for Nonprofit Developers, published by the Housing Assistance Council.

HAC’s publications list, all information sheets, and most full-length manuals and reports may be obtained free from HAC’s web site at www.ruralhome.org. A printed copy of the publications list is available free, and copies of manuals and reports are available for a charge to cover costs, from HAC, 1025 Vermont Avenue, N.W., Suite 606, Washington, D.C. 20005; 202-842-8600.


April 2002

This Information Sheet was prepared by the Housing Assistance Council (HAC). The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding from the Ford Foundation and funding under Cooperative Agreement H-5971 CA with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The substance and finding of that work are dedicated to the public. HAC is solely responsible for the accuracy of the statements and interpretations contained in this publication and such interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the government.

HAC, founded in 1971, is a nonprofit corporation that supports the development of rural low-income housing nationwide. HAC provides technical housing services, loans from a revolving fund, housing program and policy assistance, research and demonstration projects, and training and information services. HAC is an equal opportunity lender.

Rural Seniors and Their Homes: Research Note

Of the approximately 114 million occupied housing units in the United States, roughly 27 million, or 23 percent of all homes, are located in nonmetropolitan areas. Of these, 6 million, or 23 percent, are occupied by elderly-headed households.

An overwhelming majority of nonmetro senior households (89 percent) own their homes, compared to the nationwide homeownership rate of 67 percent for households of all ages. Whether seniors own or rent their homes is a significant factor affecting their housing and economic well being. Elderly rural renters generally face more challenges and greater needs associated with their housing than elderly rural homeowners.

Download PDF File

Housing for Persons with Disabilities in Rural Areas

Housing for Persons with Disabilities in Rural Areas

INTRODUCTION

Since the 1970s, activists with disabilities have redefined the “problem” of physical challenges as one of disabling environments rather than “disabled” people. In 1990, the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), Title III, put this philosophy to work by requiring that places of public accommodation, commercial facilities and certain private facilities be made accessible to persons with disabilities – including housing.

Until recently, most publicity, program initiatives and funding for housing for persons with disability have been directed at cities. Likewise, research on accessible housing has tended to focus on urban areas, leaving little systematic information about the needs of persons with disabilities in rural areas. However, through the recent research by scholars on rural disability, the beginning of a rural accessible housing agenda has been established.

The ADA defines a person with a disability as someone who: a) has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activities such as walking, seeing, hearing, or speaking; b) has a record of having such an impairment, whether or not the impairment still exists; or c) is regarded as having such an impairment, whether or not the perception is accurate. The definition also includes persons 60 years of age and older who are frail (have an inability to perform at least three activities of daily living without assistance, such as bathing, dressing or using the toilet). While advanced age, in and of itself, is not an impairment, various medical conditions commonly associated with age, such as hearing loss, osteoporosis, or arthritis, constitute disabilities.

LIVING WITH A DISABILITY IN RURAL AMERICA

Persons with disabilities in rural areas, like their urban counterparts, have a wide range of housing needs. Persons with physical disabilities need accessibility features to facilitate independent living. Persons with mental illness or persons requiring regular treatment/therapy for their condition need suitable access to a treatment facility. Frail elderly persons may require modifications to their existing homes. Others may prefer group housing or assisted living situations.

One fact of rural disability is that even though there are fewer persons with disabilities in nonmetro areas, they comprise a greater percentage of the population than in metropolitan counties. As the chart below demonstrates, while persons with disabilities make up 18 percent of the metropolitan population, they make up 23 percent of nonmetro areas; consequently, the demand for accessible living and working facilities is proportionally greater in nonmetro areas.

Source: U.S. Census, 1990

However, while the demand for accessible housing is higher in nonmetro areas, meeting that demand is also more difficult for the following reasons:

  • Residents of rural areas tend to value independence, self-reliance and individualism.1 Although these are positive values, they also contribute to a reluctance to seek help from mental or physical health professionals among persons with disabilities in rural areas. This factor also makes it difficult to assess the need for accessible housing in rural areas.
  • Transportation to health-related services is particularly problematic for rural people who may live hours from the nearest service center, clinic, hospital or day program. Nearly one-third of the 91 million people in nonmetro areas eligible for government transportation funding are transportation dependent, meaning that they have no personal transportation due to poverty (12.4 million), old age (12.1 million), and/or physical disability (11.9 million).2 Service providers must either deliver services where clients live, or arrange for rides or van pools to service sites, cutting into the time and funding available for direct services provision.
  • Recruitment, training, and retention of health service providers in rural areas is hampered by professional and social isolation, lack of training opportunities and support, low wages, and high stress.
  • Lack of basic infrastructure like municipal water and sewer services in rural areas often preclude the development of accessible housing, as well as limit the number of developers willing to work in these areas.
  • Local zoning and land use restrictions often limit the siting of group homes in both urban and rural areas. These restrictions include dispersion requirements (prohibiting group homes from locating too close to one another), concentration requirements (prohibiting the location of group homes in certain areas), and occupancy requirements (limiting the number of residents).

PROGRAMS AND RESOURCES

Federal civil rights statutes protect persons with disabilities from discrimination in virtually all housing services and programs.

  • Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Section 504).

    Section 504 prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability or perceived disability in any program or activity that receives federal financial assistance, including all public and federally subsidized housing programs. Housing providers covered by Section 504 must bear the costs of making all programs accessible to and usable by persons with disabilities.

  • The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHAA).

    The FHAA extends protection against housing discrimination to persons with disabilities. It requires housing providers to permit, at the expense of the handicapped person, reasonable modifications of existing premises upon request. It also requires housing providers to make reasonable accommodations (adjustments to rules, policies, practices or procedures) upon request by handicapped persons. FHAA covers almost all housing activities or transactions in the public or private sector, including the discriminatory application of zoning, land use, or health and safety regulations.

  • The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA).

    ADA builds on the other statutes by prohibiting discrimination against persons with disabilities in private sector employment, all public services, public accommodations, transportation and telecommunications.

As in urban areas, implementation of these statutes in rural areas is fraught with difficulties such as residents’ unawareness of their rights and housing providers’ ignorance of the law, lack of affordable legal recourse, and persistence of restrictive local land use and zoning regulations.

In addition to generally-available low-income housing grant and loan programs (such as the Section 502 Direct and Guaranteed Loan Programs), there are a few programs and resources that address the housing needs of persons with disabilities in rural areas.3 The Section 811 Supportive Housing Program for Persons with Disabilities administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is one example. The USDA/Rural Housing Service (RHS) also offers the Section 504 Home Repair Loan and Grant Program, which provides funds to modify homes for accessibility. The USDA/RHS also has a subsection of the Section 515 Rural Rental Housing Program that provides direct mortgage loans for the development of congregate housing or group homes for persons with disabilities.

Other federal programs, while not focused on serving the needs of persons with disabilities in rural areas, can also provide significant support. These include the McKinney-Vento Act homeless assistance programs, Community Services Block Grants allocated to states by the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), and housing programs administered by the Department of Agriculture’s Rural Housing Service (RHS).

Despite myriad challenges, there are several organizational resources available to assist rural persons with disabilities in securing affordable and accessible housing:

The Center for Assistive Technology (CAT/UB) 515 Kimball Tower, SUNY Buffalo Buffalo, NY 14214-3079 800-628-2281 (TTY)

National Council on the Aging, Inc. National Institute of Senior Housing 600 Maryland Ave., SW, West Wing 100 Washington, DC 20024 202-479-1200

Research and Training Center on Rural Rehabilitation Services 52 Corbin Hall, The University of Montana Missoula, MT 59812 406-243-5467 (voice/TTY) 888-268-2743 (toll free) https://ruralinstitute.umt.edu


FOOTNOTES

1Mental Health and Rural America: 1980-1993. Washington, D.C.: Federal Office of Rural Health Policy

2Spas, Diana and Tom Seekins. 1998. RURALfacts: Transportation. Missoula, MT: Research and Training Center on Rural Rehabilitation Services.

3RHS was formerly the Rural Housing and Community Development Service and before that the Farmers Home Administration. Additional information on RHS programs can be obtained from the Information Sheets on Rural Housing and Community Development Service Programs produced by the Housing Assistance Council. More information on HUD’s Section 811 program is available from the Information Sheet on Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities also produced by the Housing Assistance Council.


January 2001

This Information Sheet was prepared by the Housing Assistance Council. The work that provided the basis for this publication was supported by funding from the Ford Foundation and the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The substance and finding of that work are dedicated to the public. HAC is solely responsible for the accuracy of the statements and the interpretations contained in this publication and such interpretations do not necessarily reflect the views of the government.

Rural Homelessness

Rural Homelessness

HAC News: May 27, 2009

Access a pdf version of this HAC News. • Tammye Treviño named rural housing administrator. • Foreclosure law signed, includes provisions for tenants and Sec. 502 guaranteed borrowers, as well as McKinney-Vento changes. • New protections for renters in foreclosure take effect immediately. • Senate votes for supplemental disaster housing funds. • Additional details on HUD budget released. • HUD offers Recovery Act NAHASDA and ICDBG funds. • Section 514/516 off-farm Farm Labor Housing funds available. • RD adds processing workers to “domestic farm laborers” definition. • Comments requested on implementing Kennedy Serve America Act. • USDA plans to collect standardized data on race, other characteristics. • HUD encourages Ike/Gustav survivors to register for disaster housing vouchers. • Online ARRA Clearinghouse collects Recovery Act information. • Rural public housing authorities covered in Rural Voices magazine. • Corrected link for details about HUD’s Green Retrofit program.

May 27, 2009
Vol. 38, No. 11

TAMMYE TREVIÑO NAMED RURAL HOUSING ADMINISTRATOR. Treviño – CEO of FUTURO Communities, an Empowerment Zone in parts of Dimmit, LaSalle, Maverick, Uvalde, and Zavala counties in Texas’s Middle Rio Grande area – will begin work June 8 as the administrator of USDA RD’s Housing and Community Development Programs.

FORECLOSURE LAW SIGNED, INCLUDES PROVISIONS FOR TENANTS AND SEC. 502 GUARANTEED BORROWERS, AS WELL AS MCKINNEY-VENTO CHANGES. (See HAC News, 5/13/09.) A summary, including full text of the Section 502 guarantee provision, is posted at http://ruralhome.org/infoAnnouncements_2008HousingCrisis.php. New protections for renters in foreclosure take effect immediately. The National Low Income Housing Coalition’s summary of those provisions is at https://www.nlihc.org/template/page.cfm?id=159.

SENATE VOTES FOR SUPPLEMENTAL DISASTER HOUSING FUNDS. On May 21 the Senate passed a supplemental appropriations act for FY 2009 that would provide $30 million, not included in the House version of the bill, for vouchers for Hurricane Katrina/Rita survivors whose disaster housing aid has ended. A conference committee will resolve differences. For bill text, visit https://thomas.loc.gov/home/approp/app09.html.

ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON HUD BUDGET RELEASED. HUD’s “Congressional Justifications for 2010 Estimates” are posted at https://www.hud.gov/offices/cfo/reports/2010/main_toc.cfm.

HUD OFFERS RECOVERY ACT NAHASDA AND ICDBG FUNDS. Deadline is July 13 for NAHASDA-eligible tribes and organizations to apply for funds to develop new housing, improve existing units, and build infrastructure. Tribes and organizations that received ICDBG grants in FY 2008 can apply by July 7 for funds to encourage economic development. Visit https://www.hud.gov/recovery and click Programs.

SECTION 514/516 OFF-FARM FARM LABOR HOUSING FUNDS AVAILABLE. Pre-applications for Section 514 loans and Section 516 grants for the construction of new off-farm units for farmworkers are due July 20. See Federal Register, 5/21/09 or https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/rd/nofas/index.html. Contact an RD state office or Henry Searcy, RD, 202-720-1753, Henry.Searcy@wdc.usda.gov.

RD ADDS PROCESSING WORKERS TO “DOMESTIC FARM LABORERS” DEFINITION. The 2008 Farm Bill made workers who process agricultural or aquacultural commodities eligible for Section 514/516 housing. A new Attachment 12-A to Handbook-1-3560, explaining how this change should be implemented, is available at https://www.rurdev.usda.gov/regs/hblist.html or from USDA RD offices.

COMMENTS REQUESTED ON IMPLEMENTING KENNEDY SERVE AMERICA ACT. The Corporation for National and Community Service seeks input on implementation of the new law, which expands existing service programs and adds new ones. Visit https://www.nationalservice.gov/serveact to submit comments in writing or register for a conference call in early June. Contact Amy Borgstrom, CNCS, 202-606-6930.

USDA PLANS TO COLLECT STANDARDIZED DATA ON RACE, OTHER CHARACTERISTICS. Comments are due July 13 on a proposal for USDA agencies that serve agricultural producers and landowners to consolidate data on race, ethnicity, sex, national origin, disability, and age of farmers or ranchers. See Federal Register, 5/13/09. Contact Rhonda Davis, USDA, 202-720-1010, rhonda.davis@usda.gov.

HUD ENCOURAGES IKE/GUSTAV SURVIVORS TO REGISTER FOR DISASTER HOUSING VOUCHERS. Aid ends on May 31 for those eligible for the Disaster Housing Assistance Program (DHAP-Ike/Gustav) who have not yet enrolled. Call a local housing authority or HUD’s Referral Call Center, 1-866-785-3239.

ONLINE ARRA CLEARINGHOUSE COLLECTS RECOVERY ACT INFORMATION. The portal at https://www.nlihc.org, created by the National Low Income Housing Coalition, provides materials and links regarding the housing and development programs affected by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (see HAC News, 2/18/09).

RURAL PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITIES COVERED IN RURAL VOICES MAGAZINE. The current issue of HAC’s quarterly magazine explores ways rural PHAs have become partners in local housing and development. It also includes an article written by Rep. Lincoln Davis (D-Tenn.), the first in a series reflecting on the 60th anniversary of the Housing Act of 1949. Rural Voices is free online at http://ruralhome.org/infoRural.php. For one free print subscription per organization, contact Lawrence Adams, HAC, 202-842-8600, lawrence@ruralhome.org. To sign up for email notices announcing new issues, visit https://lists.ruralhome.org/lists/info/rural_voices.

CORRECTED LINK FOR DETAILS ABOUT HUD’S GREEN RETROFIT PROGRAM (see HAC News of 5/13/09). Go to https://www.hud.gov/recovery, click on Programs, then select Green Retrofit Program. Documents including the application are listed in the lower right column on HUD’s program page.

Housing in Rural America

As the population and economy of rural America is changing so too are rural homes. For the most part these changes have beenpositive as today more rural Americans live in safe, decent, and high quality housing than at any time. Despite this progress, far too many rural Americans live in substandard, unaffordable, or crowded homes. There are more than 111 million occupied housing unitsin the United States, roughly 25 million, or 22 percent of homes, are located in rural areas.

Download the PDF

GET THE HAC NEWS!

Sign-up for HAC information products

SIGN UP HERE

Housing Assistance Council   |  1828 L Street. N.W., Suite 505, Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 842-8600 (202) 347-3441 hac@ruralhome.org |

Board Portal

HAC is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. | Civil Rights | Privacy