Foreclosure/Housing Crisis

Information on the Foreclosure/Housing Crisis

Resources for individuals

CONTENTS OF THIS PAGE
LEGISLATIVE UPDATES

Congress Passes Foreclosure and Housing Bill with Protections for 502 Guaranteed Borrowers and Reauthorization of McKinney-Vento Homeless Programs – May 20, 2009. As reported in the HAC News of May 13, 2009, different foreclosure bills passed the House and Senate in early May. The final version of S. 896, passed by both houses on May 19, includes a variety of mortgage lending reforms, protections for tenants and for Section 502 guaranteed borrowers, and reauthorization with changes of the McKinney-Vento homeless assistance programs.

The bill, expected to be signed into law by President Obama on May 20, also requires lenders with USDA Section 502 guarantees to take steps to avoid foreclosures. It authorizes USDA to allow modifications, make loans to de-faulting borrowers, and take over modified mortgages.

The changes to the Section 502 guarantee program are set out in Section 101 of the new law, which adds three new paragraphs to the authorization for the guarantee program:

(13) LOSS MITIGATION- Upon default or imminent default of any mortgage guaranteed under this subsection, mortgagees shall engage in loss mitigation actions for the purpose of providing an alternative to foreclosure (including actions such as special forbearance, loan modification, pre-foreclosure sale, deed in lieu of foreclosure, as required, support for borrower housing counseling, subordinate lien resolution, and borrower relocation), as provided for by the Secretary.

(14) PAYMENT OF PARTIAL CLAIMS AND MORTGAGE MODIFICATIONS- The Secretary may authorize the modification of mortgages, and establish a program for payment of a partial claim to a mortgagee that agrees to apply the claim amount to payment of a mortgage on a 1- to 4-family residence, for mortgages that are in default or face imminent default, as defined by the Secretary. Any payment under such program directed to the mortgagee shall be made at the sole discretion of the Secretary and on terms and conditions acceptable to the Secretary, except that–

(A) the amount of the partial claim payment shall be in an amount determined by the Secretary, and shall not exceed an amount equivalent to 30 percent of the unpaid principal balance of the mortgage and any costs that are approved by the Secretary;

(B) the amount of the partial claim payment shall be applied first to any outstanding indebtedness on the mortgage, including any arrearage, but may also include principal reduction;

(C) the mortgagor shall agree to repay the amount of the partial claim to the Secretary upon terms and conditions acceptable to the Secretary;

(D) expenses related to a partial claim or modification are not to be charged to the borrower;

(E) the Secretary may authorize compensation to the mortgagee for lost income on monthly mortgage payments due to interest rate reduction;

(F) the Secretary may reimburse the mortgagee from the appropriate guaranty fund in connection with any activities that the mortgagee is required to undertake concerning repayment by the mortgagor of the amount owed to the Secretary;

(G) the Secretary may authorize payments to the mortgagee on behalf of the borrower, under such terms and conditions as are defined by the Secretary, based on successful performance under the terms of the mortgage modification, which shall be used to reduce the principal obligation under the modified mortgage; and

(H) the Secretary may authorize the modification of mortgages with terms extended up to 40 years from the date of modification.

(15) ASSIGNMENT-

(A) PROGRAM AUTHORITY- The Secretary may establish a program for assignment to the Secretary, upon request of the mortgagee, of a mortgage on a 1- to 4-family residence guaranteed under this chapter.

(B) PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS-

(i) IN GENERAL- The Secretary may encourage loan modifications for eligible delinquent mortgages or mortgages facing imminent default, as defined by the Secretary, through the payment of the guaranty and assignment of the mortgage to the Secretary and the subsequent modification of the terms of the mortgage according to a loan modification approved under this section.

(ii) ACCEPTANCE OF ASSIGNMENT- The Secretary may accept assignment of a mortgage under a program under this subsection only if–

(I) the mortgage is in default or facing imminent default;

(II) the mortgagee has modified the mortgage or qualified the mortgage for modification sufficient to cure the default and provide for mortgage payments the mortgagor is reasonably able to pay, at interest rates not exceeding current market interest rates; and

(III) the Secretary arranges for servicing of the assigned mortgage by a mortgagee (which may include the assigning mortgagee) through procedures that the Secretary has determined to be in the best interests of the appropriate guaranty fund.

(C) PAYMENT OF GUARANTY- Under the program under this paragraph, the Secretary may pay the guaranty for a mortgage, in the amount determined in accordance with paragraph (2), without reduction for any amounts modified, but only upon the assignment, transfer, and delivery to the Secretary of all rights, interest, claims, evidence, and records with respect to the mortgage, as defined by the Secretary.

(D) DISPOSITION- After modification of a mortgage pursuant to this paragraph, and assignment of the mortgage, the Secretary may provide guarantees under this subsection for the mortgage. The Secretary may subsequently–

(i) re-assign the mortgage to the mortgagee under terms and conditions as are agreed to by the mortgagee and the Secretary;

(ii) act as a Government National Mortgage Association issuer, or contract with an entity for such purpose, in order to pool the mortgage into a Government National Mortgage Association security; or

(iii) re-sell the mortgage in accordance with any program that has been established for purchase by the Federal Government of mortgages insured under this title, and the Secretary may coordinate standards for interest rate reductions available for loan modification with interest rates established for such purchase.

(E) LOAN SERVICING- In carrying out the program under this subsection, the Secretary may require the existing servicer of a mortgage assigned to the Secretary under the program to continue servicing the mortgage as an agent of the Secretary during the period that the Secretary acquires and holds the mortgage for the purpose of modifying the terms of the mortgage. If the mortgage is resold pursuant to subparagraph (D)(iii), the Secretary may provide for the existing servicer to continue to service the mortgage or may engage another entity to service the mortgage.

Update July 30, 2008. This morning President Bush signed H.R. 3221, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008.

Update July 29, 2008. H.R. 3221, the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, has passed both the House and the Senate. President Bush, dropping his earlier opposition, said on July 23 that he will sign it.

With passage led by Reps. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts) and Maxine Waters (D-California), the bill includes:

  • a National Affordable Housing Trust Fund, long sought by the National Low Income Housing Coalition and other advocates;
  • a back stop plan for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, with unprecedented new authority for the Treasury Department to offer credit and buy stock in the GSEs if needed.;
  • a new $3.9 billion emergency neighborhood stabilization fund, through HUD CDBG, for purchase and rehab of foreclosed properties;
  • HUD FHA modernization and new authority for FHA to insure up to $300 billion in refinancings of troubled mortgages;
  • an amendment to the USDA Section 515 program to help expedite transfers of rural rental projects for preservation or rehabilitation when Low Income Housing Tax Credits will be used;
  • improvements to housing programs for veterans and protections against foreclosure for returning soldiers;
  • a new refundable tax credit for most first-time home buyers of up to $7,500; and
  • provisions to modernize the Low Income Housing Tax Credit.

A variety of additional information about H.R. 3221 is available online, including:

Update June 26, 2008. The housing bill passed by the Senate Banking Committee, now renamed the Housing and Economic Recovery Act, will not be considered by the full Senate until after Congress’s July 4 recess, according to Congressional Quarterly’s CQ Today.

Update May 20, 2008: Senate Banking Committee Passes Major Housing Bill. On May 20, the Senate Banking Committee passed the Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008 by a 19-2 vote. The bill, which does not have a number yet, includes provisions to help homeowners facing foreclosure, create a national housing trust fund, and reform oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac:

  1. A new Hope for Homeowners Program would expand the Federal Housing Administration’s role, authorizing it to guarantee up to $300 billion in refinanced mortgages (some worth more than their homes’ values) after lenders write down the mortgage amounts.
  2. A National Affordable Housing Trust Fund (NAHTF) would finance development of housing for extremely and very low-income households.
  3. A Capital Magnet Fund would provide to Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs) and other nonprofits to leverage private capital for low-income housing and for revitalization of low-income communities. (This was originally proposed in S. 2391, the Government Sponsored Enterprise Mission Improvement Act, and is summarized here by the Opportunity Finance Network.)
  4. A new regulator for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks would intensify oversight over their capital and investment portfolios, particularly with respect to safety and soundness. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would also be able to purchase higher-cost loans.

Funding for foreclosure relief, the trust fund, and the Capital Magnet Fund would be set aside from Fannie Mae’s and Freddie Mac’s profits. The Opportunity Finance Network notes that the allocation formula could produce about $700 million.

In its first year, the Hope program would receive all of the setaside funds. In the second year, Hope would receive 50 percent, and the remaining half would be split with 65 percent going to the NAHTF and 35 percent to the Capital Magnet Fund. In the third year, Hope would receive 25 percent and the remaining 75 percent would again be split 65/35 between the trust fund and the magnet fund. In the fourth year and beyond, the 65/35 split would apply to the total amount available.

The bill will be considered next by the full Senate. If it passes, a conference committee will need to reconcile differences between this bill and H.R. 3221, passed by the House on May 8. President Bush has threatened to veto the House bill, and has not yet reacted to the Senate version.

Update May 15, 2008. The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs was expected to meet in closed session today to consider “The Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008.” According to the Committee’s website, the bill “includes major efforts to help prevent the rising number of foreclosures and to reform the regulation of the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) in order to improve their role in the housing finance system.”

Update May 9, 2008. The House on May 8 passed a comprehensive housing package of several bills. The White House has threatened a veto. Passed as a series of three complex amendments to a Senate bill, H.R. 3221 draws together several other bills:

  • H.R. 5830, the FHA Housing Stabilization and Homeownership Retention Act, which would provide FHA loans for some owners facing foreclosure and new counseling funds.
  • H.R. 1852, an FHA modernization bill, and H.R. 1427, for regulatory reform of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks.
  • H.R. 5579, the Emergency Mortgage Loan Modification Act, protecting loan servicers that modify mortgages to avoid foreclosures.
  • H.R. 5720, providing tax credits for first-time homebuyers, a real estate tax deduction for non-itemizers, additional mortgage revenue bonds, and foreclosure protections for returning soldiers.

The legislation now moves back to the Senate, which passed a very different H.R. 3221 on April 10.

Also on May 8 the House passed H.R. 5818, the Neighborhood Stabilization Act of 2008, providing $15 billion in grants and loans to states to handle foreclosed properties. The White House also is threatening to veto it.

More information is available at the House Financial Services Committee’s website.

Update April 28, 2008. On April 24 the House Financial Services Committee did not complete its review of H.R. 5830, the FHA Housing Stabilization and Homeownership Retention Act of 2008, which would provide FHA loans for some owners facing foreclosure, and H.R. 5829, the Public Housing Asset Management Improvement Act of 2008. The committee’s markup is scheduled to continue on April 30 and May 1. The committee’s sessions can be viewed live online on its website.

Update April 24, 2008. The House Financial Services Committee is moving forward on legislation based on Rep. Barney Frank’s recent proposals. On April 23 the committee passed H.R. 5818, the Neighborhood Stabilizaton Act of 2008, which would provide grants and loans to states to handle foreclosed properties; and H.R. 5579, the Emergency Mortgage Loan Modification Act of 2008, protecting loan servicers that modify mortgages to avoid foreclosure. On April 24 the committee is considering H.R. 5830, the FHA Housing Stabilization and Homeownership Retention Act of 2008, which would provide FHA loans for some owners facing foreclosure; and H.R. 5829, the Public Housing Asset Management Improvement Act of 2008.

Update April 11, 2008. On April 10 the Senate passed the bill described below, 84-12. It reduced the CDBG amount to $3.92 billion and increased the counseling funding level to $180 million. The Senate Finance Committee’s press release is available at https://finance.senate.gov/press/Bpress/2008press/prb0410208a.pdf.

As of April 8, 2008:

  • The Senate continues work this week on legislation introduced by Sens. Christopher Dodd (D-Connecticut) and Richard Shelby (R-Alabama) to help address the mortgage crisis. Final details may change, but the package as proposed would expand the HUD Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan limit, provide $4 billion in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to buy and rehab foreclosed homes, provide $100 million in additional counseling funds through NeighborWorks® America, allow non-itemizing taxpayers to take a deduction if they pay property taxes, provide help to veterans facing foreclosure, expand consumer protections under the Truth in Lending Act, and provide tax breaks to homebuilders and others and tax credits to buyers of foreclosed homes. Despite strong bipartisan support in the Senate, the White House is threatening a veto. (This bill is not numbered because it was introduced as an amendment to another bill. To find its text, go to https://thomas.loc.gov/home/r110query.html and search for “FHA Modernization Act of 2008” – include the quotation marks in your search.
  • The House Financial Services Committee holds hearings April 9 and 10 on legislation proposed by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Massachusetts). His bill (not yet introduced) would allow FHA to guarantee up to $300 billion in refinanced mortgages that have been written down by lenders. The bill also would allow FHA to create a facility to refinance loans in bulk. And the bill would provide $10 billion in loans and grants from the Treasury Department to states for the purchase, rehab and prompt occupancy of vacant, foreclosed homes.
  • Rep. Maxine Waters (D-California) on April 2 introduced H.R. 5678. It would provide $10 billion in CDBG funds to redevelop foreclosed, vacant homes.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Numerous bills have been introduced, and not all of them are summarized here. HAC will update this site periodically, but events are moving fast. For text of bills and updates, visit:

PROPOSALS TARGETED TO RURAL HOUSING
  • Responding to a House Financial Services Committee request for comments on Rep. Frank’s proposal, HAC suggested that in rural areas intense marketing efforts would be advisable, and supported a National Rural Housing Coalition recommendation to use Section 502 loans for owners and Section 533 grants for nonprofits as well as FHA loans.
  • The National Rural Housing Coalition recommended adding two provisions to Rep. Frank’s proposal.
  • Add $100 million for the Section 502 direct program with changes in refinancing policy. Section 502 direct home ownership loans are available to low- and moderate-income households. Under current policy, refinancing is limit to repairs, cases in which the borrower owns the land, and unexpected emergencies such as major medical expenses, not a reset in mortgage rate. Recommendation: change the policy to allow refinancing of existing mortgages. Increase income limit to 100% of median and population limit to 25,000 outside urbanizing areas.
  • Add $50 million for Section 533 Housing Preservation Grants to finance a rural REO program. Section 533 grants are made to nonprofit organization that can use the funds to finance the rehabilitation of single- and multifamily housing. The statute will need an amendment to allow a grantee to acquire properties with grant funds and then rehab and sell or rent them to low- and moderate-income households.


Posted: April 9, 2008
Most recent update: May 20, 2009

If you have problems accessing any of the material on this page, or if you would like to suggest additional information to include, contact Leslie Strauss at HAC, leslie@ruralhome.org, 202-842-8600.

Economic Stimulus FY09

Economic Stimulus Legislation Enacted

Housing Included

Section 502, NSP, Other Housing Funds Included in Final Stimulus Bill. February 17, 2009. President Barack Obama signed into Law H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Revitalization Act of 2009, as passed by the Congress on February 13. The final bill would fund $1 billion in direct Section 502 loans and $10.472 billion in Section 502 guaranteed loans, as well as numerous HUD programs and rural community facilities, business, and water/wastewater programs. Details are in the table below.

The final bill requires that at least 10 percent of the spending for each of the RD community facilities, business, and water/waste programs in the bill must be allocated to persistent poverty counties. These are defined as counties with poverty rates of 20 percent or more in the 1980, 1990, and 2000 decennial censuses. (This does not apply to Sec. 502 funding.)

Updated February 19.

Program

H.R. 1 Final version

USDA Sec. 502 direct

$1 billion

USDA Sec. 502 guaranteed

$10.472 billion

HUD HOME

$2.25 billion

HUD CDBG

$1 billion

HUD Native Amer. Block Grants

$510 million

HUD Public Hsg. Capital Fund

$4 billion

HUD Neighbrhd Stablztn Prog.

$2 billion

HUD Emergency Shelter Grants Prog.

$1.5 billion

HUD Lead Hazard Reduction

$100 million

HUD SHOP

0

Energy refrofits for HUD-assisted rental housing

$250 million

USDA Rural Cmnty. Facilities

$1.171 billion loans
$63 million grants

USDA Rural Water and Waste Loans and Grants

$2.82 billion loans
$968 million grants

USDA Rural Business Loans and Grants

$2.99 billion loans
$20 million grants

Senate Reaches Possible Agreement on Recovery Bill, May Vote February 10. February 9, 2009. After several days of debate and hundreds of amendments, the Senate is reportedly close to approving its version of the economic recovery and revitalization bill. The bill, called the Collins-Nelson Amendment to H.R. 1, and a summary of it, are available at the Senate Appropriations Committee website. After the Senate passes a bill, a House-Senate conference committee will need to work out the differences between the Senate’s bill and the House version of H.R. 1 (which is now available at https://thomas.loc.gov).

At midday on Monday, February 9, the Senate bill funds several rural housing and development programs, but at lower levels than the House provided. Like the House bill, it does not include funds for the National Housing Trust Fund; unlike the House bill, it also provides nothing for the Neighborhood Stabilization Program.

The following table summarizes the differences between the House and Senate bills regarding assisted housing spending.

Program

H.R. 1 passed by House 1/28/09

Collins-Nelson Amdt. in Senate 2/9/09

USDA Sec. 502 direct

$4 billion

$1 billion

USDA Sec. 502 guaranteed

$18 billion

$10.5 billion

HUD HOME

$1.5 billion

$2.25 billion*

HUD CDBG

$1 billion

0

HUD Native Amer. Block Grants

$500 million

$510 million

HUD Public Hsg. Capital Fund

$5 billion

$5 billion

HUD Neighbrhd Stablztn Prog.

$4.19 billion

0

HUD Emergency Shelter Grants Prog.

$1.5 billion

$1.5 billion

HUD Lead Hazard Reduction

$100 million

$100 million

HUD SHOP

$10 million

0

HUD Proj.-Based Section 8**

$2.5 billion

$2.25 billion

USDA Rural Broadband

$6 billion

$3.3 billion

USDA Rural Cmnty. Facilities

$1.2 billion

***

USDA Rural Water and Waste Loans and Grants

$3.8 billion

$3.8 billion

USDA Rural Business Loans and Grants

$2 billion

$3 billion

Homebuyer tax credit

0

$35 billion

* $2 billion of the Senate’s $2.25 billion would be used to fill gaps in Low Income Housing Tax Credit financing.
**The House bill allocates part of its Section 8 funds for energy-efficient retrofits of HUD-funded rental housing. The Senate bill has no provision for energy retrofits.
***The House bill provides $200 million in actual government spending to support a program level of $1.2 billion. The Senate bill probvides $127 million in spending but does not indicate the expected program level.

A more detailed table is available on the National Housing Conference’s Open House blog.

Senate Committee Approves Recovery Bill, House Passes Different Version. January 29, 2009. The full House of Representatives passed H.R. 1 on January 28 and the Senate Appropriations Committee approved a different measure, S. 336, on January 27. The Senate committee’s bill, report, and press release are available on the committee’s website, and the House bill is posted at https://thomas.loc.gov (search by bill number).

Like the House bill (summarized below), S. 336 would provide funds for a variety of rural housing and economic development programs. It would fund the Section 502 direct and guaranteed programs at lower levels than the House: $200 million in budget authority (actual federal spending) to support $1 billion in direct loans and $10.5 billion in guaranteed loans for a total of about 105,000 units.

Senators Introduce Rural Revitalization Act of 2009. January 26, 2009. Senators Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) have introduced S. 323, the Rural Revitalization Act of 2009, which would fund a number of rural programs, including the Section 502 direct and guaranteed loan programs. Like H.R. 1, it would provides $4 billion for direct loans and $18 billion in unsubsidized guaranteed loans. The full text of S. 323 is available here.

Full Text of H.R. 1, House Appropriations Committee Bill, Available. January 26, 2009. The House Appropriations Committee’s economic recovery bill (summarized below) has been numbered H.R. 1 and is available on the Committee’s website.

Senate Committee Releases Highlights of its Proposal. January 23, 2009. The Senate Appropriations Committee is scheduled to mark up a proposed bill on January 27. The proposed appropriations bill, along with tax cuts and new spending proposed by the Senate Finance Committee, totals $825 billion, according to the Appropriations Committee’s press release listing highlights of its bill. The text of the bill is not yet available. The summary includes a number of housing-related items (and there may be others in the bill itself):

  • $2.25 billion for the HOME Investment Partnerships Program block grant to enable state and local governments, in partnership with community-based organizations, to acquire, construct, and rehabilitate affordable housing and provide rental assistance to poor families.
  • $5 billion to the public housing capital fund to enable local public housing agencies to address a $32 billion backlog in capital needs – especially those improving energy efficiency in aging developments.
  • $2.1 billion for full-year payments to owners receiving Section 8 project-based rental assistance.
  • Neighborhood Stabilization Program – The bill includes $2.25 billion for the redevelopment of abandoned and foreclosed homes.
  • Homeless Prevention Fund – The bill includes $1.5 billion for homeless prevention activities, which will be sent out to states, cities and local governments through the emergency shelter grant formula.
  • $1.4 billion to support $3.8 billion in loans and grants for needed water and waste disposal facilities in rural areas.
  • Community Development Financial Institutions: $250 million to immediately provide capital to qualified community development financial institutions (CDFIs) to invest in the development of underserved communities.
  • Homeowners Assistance Program: $410 million to expand the Department of Defense Homeowners Assistance Program (HAP) during the national mortgage crisis.

House Working on Bill. January 23, 2009. The House may vote during the week of January 26 on its proposed $825 billion, two-year economic stimulus package. The bill, approved by the House Appropriations Committee and now under review by several other committees, is described below.

Rural Housing Included in House Bill. January 15, 2009. Rural housing may get a big boost in an $825 billion, two-year economic stimulus package unveiled on January 15 by the House Appropriations Committee. The draft bill includes funds for both HUD and USDA housing programs, plus support for other USDA Rural Development initiatives. Not included in the bill are the National Housing Trust Fund, Section 8, rural rental programs, and some other housing programs that had been sought by advocates.

Included are:

  • $500 million to support $22 billion in USDA Section 502 direct and guaranteed rural single-family loans. (This could mean $4 billion in direct and $18 billion in guaranteed loans, a huge increase over recent annual levels.)
  • $1.5 billion in HOME funds to help local communities build and rehabilitate low-income housing using green technologies.
  • $1 billion for Community Development Block Grants targeted to housing and services.
  • $500 million in Native American Housing Block Grants to rehabilitate and improve energy efficiency for units in Native American housing programs.
  • $5 billion in the Public Housing Capital Fund for building repair and modernization, including critical safety repairs.
  • $4.2 billion in the new Neighborhood Stabilization Program to help communities purchase and rehabilitate foreclosed, vacant properties.
  • $1.5 billion for the HUD Emergency Shelter Grant program to provide short term rental assistance, housing relocation, and stabilization services for families.
  • $100 million for competitive grants to local governments and nonprofits to remove lead-based paint hazards in low-income housing.
  • $2.5 billion for a new competitive program for energy-efficient housing retrofits — to upgrade HUD sponsored low-income housing to increase energy efficiency with new insulation, windows, and furnaces.
  • $6 billion to expand broadband internet access to rural and other underserved areas.
  • $200 million in the USDA Rural Community Facilities program to support $1.2 billion in grants and loans for such critical community facilities as healthcare, education, fire and rescue, day care, community centers, and libraries.
  • $1.5 billion in USDA rural water and waste funds to support $3.8 billion in grants and loans to help communities fund water and wastewater systems.
  • $100 million for USDA rural business grants and loans to guarantee $2 billion in loans for rural businesses.

The House Approprations Committee is expected to consider the bill the week of January 19. Congress hopes to send a final bill to President Obama by mid-February.

The House Appropriations Committee’s website provides the full text of the bill, an explanatory report, and a summary.

HAC’s recommendations for rural housing funding in the economic recovery package are available here.


Posted: January 16, 2009
Last updated: February 13, 2009

Calvin Beale

The Housing Assistance Council Remembers Calvin Beale

calvinbealeCalvin Beale lived and worked most of his life in the city of Washington DC. Yet there are few people who knew more about rural America than Calvin. He studied rural people, trends, and issues for more than half a century and was widely regarded as one of the most prolific and respected rural experts in the nation. Calvin Beale joined the United States Department of Agriculture’s Economic Research Service (ERS) in 1953, and continued working as a Senior Demographer in the agency until his death on September 2, 2008. He was 85 years old.

Calvin authored countless research reports on nearly every aspect of rural demography and economy. He had a special knack for mulling over statistics to find social patterns that eluded most. One example is his development of the Rural-Urban Continuum Codes in the 1970s. Today this coding system (generally referred to as the “Beale Codes”) is widely used by researchers and policy makers alike as an enhanced definition of rurality. But his contribution to the understanding of rural America went well beyond just figures and maps. Calvin backed up his statistical assertions with “on the ground” insights. In his tenure at USDA, he traveled to over 2,300 counties (about 75% of all US counties) and took meticulous notes that gave him a unique insight into the many complexities of rural America.

Calvin was especially helpful to the rural housing community and the Housing Assistance Council (HAC). As a member of HAC’s Research Advisory Panel, he lent his expertise and helped guide HAC’s housing research for the past eight years. Calvin was an influential writer and speaker on housing issues and the rural economy. While his contributions were invaluable, the manner in which he conducted his research and himself is even a greater legacy. Calvin never declined a request for assistance, be it to write an article, make a presentation, or answer a silly question from a junior researcher. He was as polite and kind as he was brilliant. Calvin, rural America will miss you.

The Housing Assistance Council sends its condolences to the Beale family and his colleagues at the USDA Economic Research Service.

For more information on Calvin Beale’s life and work, please see the obituaries in the Washington Post, Demographer Looked Past the Numbers to Discover the Heart of the Heartland, or the New York Times, Calvin L. Beale, Demographer With a Feel for Rural America, Dies at 85.

_____________________________

Posted: September 17, 2008
Updated: September 24, 2008

NAHASDA

President Signs H.R. 2786, Reauthorizing the Native American Housing and Self-Determination Act

Update October 17, 2008: On October 14, President Bush signed the NAHASDA reauthorization act into law. Read the National American Indian Housing Council’s press release and other materials here.

On September 25 and 27, the Senate and House approved a compromise version of H.R. 2786, reauthorizing the Native American Housing and Self-Determination Act (NAHASDA) through 2013, with important amendments. Originally enacted in 1996, NAHASDA consolidated several federal housing programs into a single, formula-based block grant program. Built on the solid foundation of Indian self-determination law and policy, NAHASDA recognizes tribes’ authority to provide housing and related infrastructure to their members in a way that maximizes tribal decisionmaking and flexibility in meeting their housing goals.

The reauthorization of NAHASDA comes after years of hard work by tribes, Alaska Native villages, tribal housing authorities, and the National American Indian Housing Council (NAIHC), among others. The bill was sent to the President on October 3, and he is expected to sign it into law by the October 15 deadline.

Important provisions include the following.

  • Related to the HOME Investment Partnerships program, the law states, “Nothing in this Act or amendment prohibits or prevents any participating jurisdiction from providing amounts to an Indian tribe or TDHE.” In some states, tribes have been deemed ineligible for HOME because they were not considered to be participating jurisdictions. This change allows them to participate in the HOME Program.
  • Section 206 establishes a new “Subtitle B-Self-Determination Housing Activities for Tribal communities” to provide more flexibility in developing housing and infrastructure.
  • The law also adds an amendment to Title VI which establishes a demonstration program to expand community and economic loan programs to tribes and tribally designated housing entities (TDHEs), a resource already available to local governments, to support the development of affordable housing for American Indians and Alaska Natives. The demonstration program is limited to four tribes or TDHEs per HUD region.
  • The act requires HUD to contract with an organization with expertise in housing and demographic data collection to assess existing data sources for the determination of need and to recommend methodologies for collecting data, including for the allocation formula.
  • The act also includes language ensuring the continued provision of NAHASDA programs and services to the Cherokee Freedmen, descendents of former slaves who are currently embroiled in a membership dispute with the Cherokee Nation. This matter will be settled in the courts. Further information about the dispute is available in numerous places, including:

____________________________

Posted: October 10, 2008
Last updated: October 17, 2008

Reg Changes Section 502 G

USDA Rural Development Changes Regs for Rental Preservation and Section 502 Guaranteed

Updated November 5, 2008: Two new USDA RD regulations were published in the Federal Register on November 4, 2008.

Multifamily housing: Changes and corrections in the regulation governing preservation for the Section 515 rental housing and 514/516 farm labor housing programs are issued as a final rule, effective immediately.

Single-family housing: RD simplifies the income categories used to qualify borrowers for the Section 502 guaranteed loan program. Rather than using an eight-tiered system with separate income levels for families based on number of family members up to eight, RD will use two tiers, one for families with one to four people and a second for families with five to eight members. This is a “direct final rule” and will become effective without change unless RD receives adverse written comments by January 4, 2009.

____________________________

Posted: November 3, 2008
Updated: November 5, 2008

NSP

Information on HUD’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program

CONTENTS OF THIS PAGE

HUD’s Neighborhood Stabilization Program
Additional Information and Links


HUD’S NEIGHBORHOOD STABILIZATION PROGRAM

Update November 20, 2008. All NSP plans should now be available online for comment; some comment periods may have closed. Jurisdictions receiving NSP funds must submit their plans to HUD by December 1. Key links for current information are:

October 15, 2008.The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 created a new Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP), making $3.92 billion available through the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program to help state and local governments purchase, renovate, and resell foreclosed properties. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has identified about 300 states and CDBG entitlement communities that can apply by December 1 for allocations of NSP funds.

Rural governments and nonprofits should have opportunities to influence the use of these funds, and/or to be designated subrecipients, through states and some metropolitan area governments. The sub-state allocation process will not necessarily be the same as CDBG’s. Each state will decide how to distribute its funds, or — an option not available in the CDBG program — whether to use the funds itself. The legislation requires states and local governments to allocate funds to places with the greatest needs, including those with the highest percentages of foreclosures and subprime loans.

HAC is offering to collect questions and comments on the regulations, particularly as they relate to rural areas, and will provide the information to HUD. Please send questions or comments to Leslie Strauss at HAC, leslie@ruralhome.org or 202-842-8600 ext. 141.


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND LINKS

_____________________________

Posted: October 15, 2008
Updated: November 20, 2008

If you have problems accessing any of the material on this page, or if you would like to suggest additional information to include, contact Leslie Strauss at HAC, leslie@ruralhome.org, 202-842-8600.

FY08 HUD NOFAs

FY 2008 News on HUD’s SuperNOFA and Other HUD NOFAs

Update: Section 202 Predevelopment Funds Available, Deadline Extended to February 18.

Update: Continuum of Care Deadline Extended Again, to October 23. A notice published in the Federal Register on October 9 further extends the due date for applications to October 23 instead of October 16.

Update: Continuum of Care Deadline Extended to October 16. A notice published in the Federal Register on September 15 makes a clarification in the Continuum of Care NOFA published on July 10 and extends the due date for applications to October 16 instead of September 26.

Update: HUD Announces FY 2008 RHED Funding Recipients. Sixty organizations will receive a total of $16.9 million from HUD’s Rural Housing and Economic Development (RHED) program. HUD’s press release, with a link to more information about the program, is available here. The list of awardees is also available here.

Update: HUD Invites Review Requests from Applicants with Grants.gov Problems, Deadline September 5 or 15 Days after NOFA Deadline. Because some applicants for HUD assistance in 2008 have reported technical difficulties in applying electronically through grants.gov, HUD is now conducting a Quality Assurance Review (QAR). HUD wants to identify applicants that correctly followed all electronic application submission instructions, including registration for electronic submission, but were unable to submit an application because of technical problems related to the use of the Adobe Acrobat forms and Grants.gov error messages.

Applicants that had difficulties submitting an electronic application for a NOFA for which the deadline has passed may submit a request for QAR by September 5, 2008. Applicants having difficulties responding to a NOFA for which the deadline date has not passed may submit a request for QAR during the 15 days after the deadline date. For details, see the August 21Federal Register notice.

Update: Continuum of Care NOFA Details Published August 13, Deadline September 26. A noticepublished in the Federal Register on August 13 makes technical corrections in the Continuum of Care NOFA published on July 10 and establishes September 26 as the application deadline. Applicants must use HUD’s e-snaps system to apply.

Update: Continuum of Care Funds Available, Deadline Approximately September 15, Announced July 10, 2008. About $1.42 billion is available for HUD’s Continuum of Care Homeless Assistance Program, according to a July 10 Federal Register notice. Applicants must use HUD’s e-snaps system to apply, but e-snaps is not yet able to accept applications. HUD will publish another Federal Register notice setting a deadline after the system is operational. .HUD expects the deadline to be about September 15.

Update: HOPE VI Main Street Funds Available, Deadline August 15, Announced June 26, 2008. The HOPE VI Main Street Grants program has $4 million available, HUD announced in a June 26 Federal Register notice. Applications are due on August 15, 2008.

Update: SuperNOFA Corrections Issued, June 9 and 12, 2008. A Federal Register notice on June 9 made changes to the SuperNOFA sections for Section 202 elderly housing and Section 811 housing for people with disabilities. The program deadlines remain the same.

A Federal Register notice on June 12 corrected the SuperNOFA provisions on:

  • the hourly rate for consultants published in the General Section;
  • Appendix A of the Introduction to the SuperNOFA;
  • Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program;
  • Lead Hazard Reduction Demonstration Grant Program;
  • Operation Lead Elimination Action Program;
  • Lead Outreach Grant Program;
  • Housing Choice Voucher Family Self-Sufficiency Program, including changing the deadline to July 16;
  • Resident Opportunity and Self-Sufficiency (ROSS) Service Coordinators Program; and
  • Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP), including changing the deadline to July 18. The deadline for local self-help organizations to apply to the Housing Assistance Council for SHOP funds has not changed.

The June 12 notice also explained how applicants should address “a technical issue” with the Grants.gov SF-424 form.

Update: SuperNOFA Available, May 13, 2008. Funding announcements are available through the links below as well as on grants.gov, at HUD’s website, and in the Federal Register of Monday, May 12.

Additional useful links:

Currently Available Information for Continuum of Care Applicants, May 6, 2008.

Access Information by Phone

  • If you have difficulty accessing SuperNOFA information online, contact HUD’s NOFA Information Center, Monday through Friday 10:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Eastern Time, 1-800-483-8929 (toll free).
  • To reach HUD’s Office of Departmental Grants Management and Oversight, call 202-708-0667.

Links to Additional Resources

If you have trouble accessing any information on HAC’s site only (not HUD’s or grants.gov), please contact Leslie Strauss or Janice Clark, 202-842-8600.


Posted: March 19, 2008
Last updated: December 12, 2008


FY08 RD NOFA

USDA RD Funds Available, FY 2008

Update September 24, 2008. USDA RD has announced recipients of 2008 funds under the Rural Community Development Initiative and Housing Preservation Grant programs.

Update August 19, 2008. The NOFA for RD’s Preservation Revolving Loan Fund, which makes loans to intermediaries who then re-loan the funds to owners or purchasers of USDA-financed rental housing, was issued on August 19. This year for the first time the funds can be used for preservation of Section 514/516 farmworker housing as well as for Section 515 multifamily rental housing. Applications are due October 20.

Update July 31, 2008. USDA transfers funds to Section 502 guarantees. USDA has shifted $13 million in FY 2008 budget authority (more than $20 million in program funds) from Sections 502 direct, 514/516, 504/533, and processing workers housing to generate over $1.2 billion for Section 502 guarantees. Reps. Rubén Hinojosa (D-TX) and Lincoln Davis (D-TN) are leading an effort in the House to restore the funds in a supplemental appropriations bill.

Update July 21, 2008. RD published an amendment to its April 21Federal Register notice on the Section 538 demonstration. Rather than requiring each applicant to have received its program obligation at least one week before the deadline for its application, RD is making all applicants with obligations during FY 2008 eligible. This seems to mean that an applicant receiving its obligation on September 29 could apply on September 29 for the final round of the demo (if funds were still available).

Update April 30, 2008. RD published a notice in the April 30 Federal Register correcting the percentages of funds for the Section 502 direct and 504 programs that are available for each quarter of FY 2008.

Update April 21, 2008. As it did in 2007, RD is implementing a demonstration program for Section 538 loan guarantees that cover both construction and permanent financing. RD’s announcement in the April 21 Federal Register explains the process for Section 538 applicants to request these continuous guarantees. Those who received Section 538 obligations between October 1, 2007 and April 4, 2008 can make a request by April 25. The request deadlines for later rounds are July 11 and September 29.

Update March 28, 2008. The annual “1940-L” notice for FY 2008 regarding allocation of funds for most of USDA’s rural housing programs was published in today’s Federal Register. Deadlines (if any) and links are provided in the table below.

Update March 24, 2008. The NOFA for USDA RD’s Section 542 Voucher Program was published in today’s Federal Register. USDA has $5 million available to provide vouchers for low-income tenants in Section 515 properties whose loans are prepaid or foreclosed after September 30, 2005. A voucher can be used at the prepaid property or anywhere else in the country, provided that the landlord is willing to accept the voucher and the unit passes an RD health inspection. A voucher is for one year, with a three year limit on voucher assistance to each tenant or family. USDA will follow Section 8 regs and administrative guidance as much as possible.

Update March 12, 2008. Today’s Federal Register contains funding announcements for Section 515 new construction, Section 514/516 off-farm new construction, and the Multi-Family Housing Preservation Demonstration Program (MPR). This year for the first time MPR funds are available for Section 514/516 developments as well as Section 515. A minor correction to the Section 533 Housing Preservation Grant funding notice was also published on March 12, providing accurate contact information for the Rural Development State Office in Oregon.

USDA Rural Development funding notices published to date are summarized in the table below, and new notices will be added as they are issued.

Links to funding notices for business and utilities programs are available on USDA RD’s website, here.

Program, Link, and Publication Date

Deadline

Eligible Applicants

Contact

Sec. 502 single-fam. direct (March 28 and correction April 30)

Rolling

Low- and very low-income homebuyers

RD local offices

Sec. 502 single-fam. guaranteed (March 28)

Rolling

Low- and very low-income homebuyers

RD local offices

Sec. 504 repair loans (March 28 and correction April 30)

Rolling

Very low-income homeowners

RD local offices

Sec. 504 repair grants (March 28)

Rolling

Very low-income homeowners age 62 or older

RD local offices

Sec. 515 new constr. (March 12)

May 12

Nonprofits, for-profits, indivs., prtnrshps., pub. agencies, etc.

RD state offices

Multifamily revitaliz. demo (MPR) (March 12)

May 12

Owners or purchasers of Sec. 515 or Sec. 514/516 (off-farm) rental property

Sherry Engel, 715-345-7677

Preserv. Revolving Loan Fund (Aug. 19)

Oct. 20

Nonprofits, nonprofits’ loan funds, state or local hsg. finance agencies

Henry Searcy, Jr., 202-720-1753 or Bonnie Edwards-Jackson, 202-690-0759

Sec. 514 farm labor loans (off-farm) (March 12)

May 12

Nonprofits, pub. agencies, tribes, prtnrshps w/ nonprofit GP *

RD state offices

Sec. 516 farm labor grants (off-farm) (March 12)

May 12

Nonprofits, pub. agencies, frmwrkr ass’ns, tribes

RD state offices

Farmworker housing disaster and emerg. funds (Feb. 4)

April 4

Nonprofits and public agencies

RD local offices or Henry Searcy, 202-720-1753

Farmworker housing technical assistance (Feb. 4)

March 14

Public and private nonprofits

Sue M. Harris-Green, 202-720-1604

Sec. 523 self-help tech. assistance (March 28)

Nonprofits, public agencies with existing Sec. 523 TA contracts (no new applications accepted in FY 2008)

Technical & Management Assistance Contractors
Information about partial funding of self-help TA grants in FY 2008 is available here

Sec. 523/524 site loans (March 28)

Rolling

Nonprofits, public agencies, tribes

RD local offices

Sec. 306C water/waste (March 28)

Rolling

Nonprofits, public agencies, tribes in Ariz., Calif., N.M., and Texas

RD local offices

Sec. 525/509 packaging (March 28)

Rolling

States, state agencies, local gov’t, nonprofits

RD local offices

Sec. 533 Hsg. Preserv. Grants (Feb. 20 and correction March 12)

April 21

Nonprofits, state or local gov’t agencies, tribes

RD state offices

Sec. 538 guar. rental (Feb. 4)

April 25, then rolling while funds available

Approved lenders

RD state offices

Sec. 538 guar. demo (April 21)

April 25, July 11, Sept. 29

Approved lenders

RD state offices

Sec. 542 vouchers (March 24)

Rolling

Tenants in Sec. 515 properties w/ prepaid or foreclosed mortgages

RD offices or Stephanie B.M. White, 202-720-1615

Rural Community Devel. Init. (RCDI) (Feb. 4)

May 5

Nonprofit and public intermediaries, tribes

RD state offices

Household Water Well Systems Grants (Jan. 28)

May 31

Nonprofits

Cheryl Francis, 202-720-1937

* HAC stated incorrectly in the HAC News of March 12, 2008 and on this page that farmers were eligible for Section 514 loans for off-farm housing. Farmers are eligible for Section 514 loans for on-farm housing only, and may apply at any time. Contact an RD state office for more details. HAC apologizes for any confusion.

Posted: Feb. 20, 2008
Last updated:April 30, 2008

FY08 Appropriations

Appropriations for Fiscal Year 2008

2008 Omnibus Appropriations Bill (UPDATED Jan. 22, 2008)
Continuing Resolutions (UPDATED Dec. 20, 2007)
USDA (UPDATED Dec. 17, 2007)
HUD (UPDATED Dec. 17, 2007)

Click here for information on the Administration’s budget proposal for FY 2009.
Click here for more details on the Administration’s budget proposal for FY 2008.
All bills and accompanying reports related to FY 2008 appropriations are available at https://thomas.loc.gov/home/approp/app08.html.

Congress imposes conditions on RD office closings (reprinted from HAC News, 1/16/08). The omnibus appropriations act for FY 2008 prohibits closing RD offices until the impact on cost and program delivery is determined, and requires reporting the justification for any closure or relocation to Congress at least 60 days in advance. (See HAC News, 7/3/07, reporting the possibility of some office closures.) Visit https://thomas.loc.gov/home/approp/app08.html to access the omnibus act; a joint statement by the appropriations committees expressing concern about office closures was printed in the December 17, 2007 Congressional Record, pp. H15761-62.

Farmworker housing added to rental preservation program for FY 2008 (reprinted from HAC News, 1/16/08). The FY 2008 omnibus appropriations act makes Section 514/516 properties eligible for RD’s Multi-Family Housing Preservation and Revitalization Restructuring Program. In FY 2006 and 2007, RD has offered these “MPR” funds through a NOFA published in the spring. The omnibus act is available at https://thomas.loc.gov/home/approp/app08.html.

President signs omnibus appropriation for 2008. On December 26, President Bush signed the omnibus spending bill for 2008. This means USDA and HUD housing programs will be funded through September 30, 2008 at the amounts shown in the last columns in the tables below.

Dec. 20: After votes on December 17, 18, and 19, the House of Representatives and the Senate had passed an omnibus appropriations bill that would fund most of the federal government, including USDA and HUD, for fiscal 2008. The two houses initially adopted different dollar figures for war funding, but came to an agreement by the end of the day on December 19 and sent the omnibus bill to President Bush for signature.

The omnibus bill cuts some programs, but protects most, in order to reach a total budget ceiling sought by President Bush. The omnibus is H.R. 2764 and is technically a very large amendment to the House Foreign Operations spending bill for 2008. The bill groups together 11 appropriations bills for the 2008 fiscal year that began on October 1. The White House had been threatening a veto of any bill that exceeds the President’s budget request for 2008. The text of the bill is available at https://www.rules.house.gov/110_fy08_omni.htm.

Continuing Resolutions. On December 19, the House and Senate both passed a Fourth Continuing Resolution that would extend funding at FY 2007 levels from December 21, when the Third CR expires, to December 31.

Nov. 14, 2007 — On November 13, 2007, President Bush signed into law the second Continuing Resolution passed by Congress for fiscal year 2008, which began on October 1, 2007. This new stopgap measure funds the government through December 14, keeping most programs at FY 2007 levels. It does provide $3 million in new Community Development Block Grant funds for Louisiana’s Road Home program for survivors of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.

Sept. 14, 2007 — With the 2008 fiscal year beginning on Oct. 1, USDA, HUD and all other federal programs are operating under a continuing resolution through Nov. 16. President Bush signed the CR on Sept. 29. Congress has yet to complete and send to the President any of the 12 appropriations bills. The White House has threatened a veto of any bill that exceeds the President’s budget request for 2008. It is unclear whether Congress may send separate spending bills, a large omnibus package, or some combination of both approaches. Final negotiations will likely go beyond Nov. 16.

USDA. In the near-final omnibus bill, some USDA rural housing programs are cut while others are at higher levels than in 2007. Sec. 502 guaranteed loans would rise sharply to $4.22 billion, with Congress urging this program’s use as an alternative to subprime mortgages. Sec. 523 self-help housing would increase to $39 million. But Sec. 515 rental loans, rental assistance and farm labor housing loans and grants would be cut. Like the House and Senate bills passed earlier this year, the omnibus bill rejects the very deep budget cuts for rural housing programs that were proposed in the Administration’s 2008 budget. That February 2007 proposal had called for the elimination of Section 502 and 515 direct loans and a drastic cut in self-help housing.

The table below has details.

USDA RD Program
(dollars in millions)

FY 2006
Approp.

FY 2007
Approp. (a)

FY 2008
Proposed Budget

FY 2008
Senate Bill
(S. 1859)

FY 2008
House Bill
(H.R. 3161)

FY 2008
Omnibus Bill
(H.R. 2764)

502 Single-Family Direct Loans

$1,141

$1,141

$0

$1,129.4

$1,129.4

$1,129.4

502 Single-Family Guaranteed Loans

3,681

3,681

4,848

3,561.1

3,716.4

4,220

504 Very Low-Income Repair Loans

35

35

22.9

34.7

34.7

34.7

514 Farm Labor Housing Loans

38

38

14

27.7

50

27.7

515 Rental Housing Direct Loans

100

100

0

70

99

70

538 Rental Housing Guaranteed Loans

100

100

200

150

99

130

504 Very Low-Income Repair Grants

30

30

30

29.6

30

30

516 Farm Labor Housing Grants

14

14

4

10

25

10

523 Self-Help TA

34

34

9.5

38

40

39

533 Housing Preservation Grants

10

10

9

9.9

9

9

521 Rental Assistance (b)

653

616

567

497

533

482.1

542 Rural Housing Voucher Program

16

16

27.8

15.5

10

5

Rental Preservation Revolving Loans

3

3

0

2.9

3

3

Rental Preservation Demonstration

9

9

0

15

14.8

20

Rural Community Dev’t Initiative (RCDI)

6

6

0

6.3

0

6.3

a. Figures shown for FY 2006 are before 1% across the board cut.
b. Rental Assistance contracts were for four years in FY 2006 and for two years in FY 2007. The FY 2008 bill provides one-year contracts

HUD. Also part of the omnibus is the 2008 Transportation-HUD appropriations bill. It cuts Community Development Block Grants, HOME and Section 8 vouchers below the levels in both House and Senate spending bills passed earlier this year. Most other HUD programs retained the funding levels of 2007 or the increases won in Congress earlier this year for 2008. The HUD rural housing program would receive $17 million, the same as in 2007. The SHOP program would rise from 19.8 million in 2007 to $26.5 million in 2008.

HUD Program
(in millions of dollars)

FY 2006
Approp. (a)

FY 2007
Approp. (a)

FY 2008 Proposed Budget

FY 2008 House Bill (H.R. 3074)

FY 2008 Senate Bill
(H.R. 3074)

FY 2008 Conf. Rpt. (H.R. 3074)

FY 2008 Omnibus Bill (H.R. 2764)

Community Develop. Block Grants

$4,220

$3,771.9

$3,035.6

$4,180

$4,060

$4,000

$3,865.8

HOME
(Mortgage Foreclosure Mitigation Activities)

1,750

1,750

1,967b

1,757

1,970
(100)

1,767
— (b)

1,704
— (d)

Tenant-Based Rental Assistance

15,574

15,920

16,000

16,330

16,599

16,436

16,391

Project-Based Rental Assistance

5,088

5,976

5,813

6,480

5,813

6,382

6,381.8

Public Housing Capital Fund

2,464

2,464

2,024

2,439

2,500

2,439

2,439

Public Housing Operating Fund

3,600

3,864

4,000

4,200

4,200

4,200

4,200

Public Hsg. Revtlztn. (HOPE VI)

99

99

0

120

100

120

100

Native Amer. Housing Block Grant

630

630

627

627

630

630

630

Homeless Assistance Grants

1,326.6

1,441.6

1,561

1,561

1,586

1,586

1,586

Hsg. Opps. for Persons with AIDS

289

289

300

300

300

300

300

202 Housing for the Elderly

734.6

734.6

575

734.6

735

735

735

811 Housing for Disabled

236.6

236.6

125

236.6

237

237

237

Fair Housing

45.5

45.5

45

45.5

52

50

50

Rural Hsg. and Econ. Dev. (RHED)

17

17

0

16.8

17

17

17

Self-Help Hmownp. Opp. (SHOP)

20

19.8

39

27.7

26.5

26.5

26.5

Lead Hazard Control

152

152

116

130

151

145

145

Housing Counseling

42

44.5

50

41.6

150

50(c)

50(c)

a. Figures shown for FY 2006 and 2007 are before 1% across the board cut.
b. $200 million in counseling and foreclosure prevention activities is provided to the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation.
c. Housing counseling funding is under the HOME program.
d. Foreclosure prevention activities moved to appropriation for Neighborhood Reinvestment (not in HUD).

Updated: Jan. 22, 2008

If you have problems accessing any of the material on this page, contact Leslie Strauss at HAC, leslie@ruralhome.org, 202-842-8600.

Rural Platform

Help Develop a Rural Housing Platform

HAC is working with rural communities across the country to develop a Rural Housing Platform that is being shared with the incoming Obama Administration and Congress. As of January 2, 2009, HAC has developed one-page papers on 11 separate issues. The papers are available here in a single document that contains all 11, or in individual documents:

Those who attended the HAC National Rural Housing Conference 2008 had the opportunity to discuss and to blog about the platform. Due to technological problems, HAC is not yet able to post the blog on its website. We invite you to email your comments to Leslie Strauss at HAC, leslie@ruralhome.org, and we will post them here so the discussion can continue.

Please help us by sending your comments and recommendations on three major issues impacting rural affordable housing development:

  1. What measures need to be taken to ensure that USDA’s housing programs remain accessible to rural communities?
  2. Given reduced philanthropic and government resources, what opportunities exist to help increase nonprofit sustainability?
  3. How can vulnerable populations (e.g., homeless, Native American) be effectively served in the current economic environment?

Comments posted to date:

ACCESSING THE UNACESSIBLE
(The Failure of Rural America to Access the Grant Process)

At first glance it could be perceived that the opportunities for Rural America to receive grants are many and varied. From healthcare to housing to education to childcare to infrastructure to livestock to farm aide, you name it and it can not only be found but found in abundance. But the truth is that very few of these grants, in proportion to those that are offered, are accessed by Rural America. There are a lot of well held beliefs for this apathetic behavior toward free aide by Rural America. Some of them are that Rural America is distrustful of strangers; that they distrust the federal government; they like the way that they live and; they are resistant to change. For the record, I was born in Rural America in a share croppers’ shanty. Most of my family and friends live in Rural America and I can say with out a doubt that these are not the beliefs of poor Rural America. But it certainly can be and on most occasions are the beliefs of large property owners, local politicians and middle class and above residents in Rural America. Those who are fine with things just the way they are. This population, all though relatively small in numbers, represent most of the almost insurmountable resistance to the aide that Rural America so direly need. The rest of the resistance is caused by systemic measures that appear to be fair and reasonable to those who accept their advantages and opportunities as the norm for all.

There are four major obstacles to Rural America accessing grants and other opportunities available to them: (1) lack of knowledge; (2) lack of resources; (3) Inability to access resources and; (4) the lack of support from local politicians, agencies, banks and power brokers:

  • Lack of Knowledge – Federal Agencies are quick to tell you that any grants and other opportunities that they have can be found on their web site. This is what they call freedom of information. But most people in Rural America do not have a computer and those that have one have limited skills in its application. There are no radio or television programs informing the community of what grants and/or opportunities are available for them, even though this would be the best way to get information to the Rural Community.
  • Lack of Resources – Even if someone gains the information about a grant and/or opportunity available to their community, there is still the question of who will research and write the proposal. Rural America is not a haven for grant writers and/or program consultants.
  • Inability to Access Resources – Grant writers in Rural America are generally employed by the Educational Systems, Healthcare Systems, County/Town and local Agencies. Seldom if ever will one of these entities donate the use of these persons for the general use of the community and if you seek their assistance outside their employment, they request their money in advance. The problem with this is that if the community had the money, they would not be seeking a grant.
  • Lack of Support from Local Politicians, Agencies, Banks and Power Brokers – the refusal of local politicians, agencies, banks and power brokers to support something that they did not initiate, can not benefit from and/or control is the single greatest reason for the inability of Rural Communities to apply for and/or successfully complete Federally funded grants and other opportunities. If Rural America is fortunate enough to obtain a grant it is not unusual for them to either be unable to fulfill the requirements of the grant opportunity and/or fail to sustain it for more than three years. The unspoken rule is what the powers that be can not control they will destroy.

Lee Walter Jenkins
December 19, 2008

I think it is critical to find new ways to measure and describe housing problems in rural areas. For instance, in our state the data used to justify the distribution of Neighborhood Stabilization Program monies had little to say about rural areas. The data was unreliable if it existed at all. Other data sources, like RealtyTrac, favored urban areas by counting one foreclosure multiple times. Fast forward to December 2008 when the 3-year estimates were released from the census. In our county of over 80,000 the margin of error on even basic data like household income had a margin of error of 10-20% (although I don’t doubt those numbers will become more reliable in coming years.) If we are going to have anything to say about rural housing then we need new ways to measure and express need because we are at a huge disadvantage statistically when compared with urban areas.

Alan Trunnell’s comments (below) add a lot to the discussion – rural areas are where the greatest opportunities for creative thinking on affordable housing exist. We have discussed things like community land trusts, working with local farmers to put a small set of affordable housing on unused land (and give them an additional monthly income), and combining neighborhood housing redevelopment with small scale cottage industry. There is funding at the state level for more creative, outside-the-box initiatives like this but it is not nearly enough and rarely funds personnel. Federal support could play an important role here, at the very least it could help in providing seed monies that counties or nonprofits could then match.

Finally, it seems obvious to me that there should be some reward/incentive for providing comprehensive planning for the related areas of affordable housing, poverty, and homelessness. It is tough to distinguish where one of these issues ends and the other begins.

Thanks for the opportunity to comment, I think everyone here has had something to add to this discussion.
Tim Emmert
Moore County (NC) Community Development
December 18, 2008

In Arizona this administration has consolidated its offices into the metropolitan areas Phoenix, Green Valley (closer to Tucson), therefore there is no intake opportunities other than non-profit housing entities. We will need to build capacity of non-profit counseling agencies in rural areas, by increasing the 502 direct loan funding allocations, and go back to the 525 packing fees paid to non-profits for taking applications and counseling rural residents on their best mortgage options particularly the USDA loan programs.

Additionally, something has to be done in the form of acquisition of existing properties to allow for first-time rural residents to buy these homes, as opposed to investors purchasing them and then renting them or reselling them for higher prices. Other than subsequent 502 loans which of course many of these foreclosed properties are not financed through USDA. There is a glut of foreclosed properties in rural areas, and there aren’t the type of rural housing programs throughout rural Arizona that we once thought we had. What is going on is that the USDA Guarantee Program was increased and the expense of the 502 direct loan program, and we’ll be seeing more of these foreclosure as well, what then?
Thank You,
Frank J. Martinez
Community Equity
December 16, 2008

I am a housing counselor for Community Action Partnership in Lewiston Idaho. I am spending a considerable amount of time on foreclosure prevention counseling. I wish the new administration would greatly expand the USDA RD RHS 502 Home loan program so owners who can only afford subsidized payments would be able to refinance their current conventional loans into USDA loans. I wish they would also include urban areas. This would certainly prevent a lot of foreclosures. Many of the people I am working with have lost jobs or become disabled — including seniors who do not have the equity for reverse mortgages.
Barbara
December 10, 2008

As the Executive Director of non-profits located in southern West Virginia, I want to speak to serving vulnerable populations. I know without the assistance of non-profits in our area there would be little housing development. Private developers cannot overcome the issues of lack of infrastructure and low appraisal values for housing in our poverty stricken area. The need to support the capacity building of non-profit organizations is a way to serve vulnerable populations.
Sharon Walden, Executive Director of SAFE
McDowell County, WV
December 3, 2008

As the only founding director of HAC, I am extremely proud of the job the HAC staff has done with this conference and with its mission over the years. We started with about three million dollars and no staff with knowledge of rual housing. Now our assets are about go million dollars and we have assisted poor people in building anout 60 million self help housing. WE have been doing subprime lending for almost 40 years without major defaults. CongraduLATIONS HAC. I may not get there with you but I know you will worl your self out of A MISSION.
December 3, 2008

I think we should urge the new administration to think outside of the traditional silos in which federal programs normally operate. For example, lack of public infrastructure is one of the major challenges in developing affordable housing in rural areas. If communities applying for federal infrastructure funding were given financial incentives to direct those funds to affordable housing developments that would make an enormous difference. Climate change legislation might offer some possibilities such as directing money from the sale of carbon credits to energy efficiency improvements and even alternative energy in affordable housing.
Polly Nichol
December 4, 2008

I wonder how well we approach rural community viability. I have some concerns that while we strive to provide affordable rural housing are we considering rural community sustainability;job creation, telecommunications, small farms, coops, and maybe outside the box enterprise that supports the growth of the rural village. thanks for allowing me to comment,
Alan Trunnell
December 4, 2008

I would like for the new administration to consider revising the program’s implementation policies/regulations ..most of the times the people that creates the regulations for the programs are so unaware of the issues because they are no longer relate to the poor..and the results are programs that nobody qualifies for..We need to consider the people that really works directly with the low income families in the process of developing the programs in order to successfully implement them.
San Juana Gonzales, Uvalde, Texas
December 4, 2008

1. Enact the Section 515 revitalization program;
2. Create a resident voucher program that protect residents and operates similar to the HUD enhanced voucher program.
3. Limit the guaranteed loan program and create mechanisms to protect borrowers against foreclosrue.
4. increase the RD staff and bring servicing back to the local offices.
December 4, 2008

____________________________

To add an entry, email your comment to Leslie Strauss at HAC, leslie@ruralhome.org, and it will be posted here.

The latest draft (January 2, 2009) of HAC’s “Affordable Rural Housing Issues and Recommendations” paper is available here.

____________________________

Posted: December 8, 2008
Last updated: January 2, 2009

GET THE HAC NEWS!

Sign-up for HAC information products

SIGN UP HERE

Housing Assistance Council   |  1828 L Street. N.W., Suite 505, Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 842-8600 (202) 347-3441 hac@ruralhome.org |

Board Portal

HAC is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. | Civil Rights | Privacy