The Housing Assistance Council is an independent, non-partisan and regularly responds to Congressional committees, Member offices, federal agencies, and policy advocacy coalitions with the research and information needed to make informed policy decisions. Our research work, Rural Data Portal, and Veterans Data Central all provide valuable, educational context to frame the rural policy conversation. If you want to know how a new program or policy could impact America’s small towns and rural places, please don’t hesitate to contact us at policy@ruralhome.org.

HUD Funding Finally Set for FY26

UPDATE, February 4, 2026 – After a brief partial government shutdown over the weekend, on February 3 the House passed the Senate-approved fiscal year 2026 appropriations bill covering several federal agencies, including HUD, and the president signed the measure into law.

UPDATE, January 23, 2026 – On January 22 the House passed the fiscal year 2026 funding bill that covers HUD. The Senate is expected to approve it during the week of January 26. The White House has said President Trump will sign it.

January 22, 2026 – Text has been released for final funding bills that cover most of the agencies operating under a continuing resolution through January 30, including HUD. House and Senate appropriators agreed to keep many HUD programs at the dollar levels they received in FY24 and FY25. Details are shown in the table below. Homeless assistance grants, Section 202 elderly housing, Section 811 housing for persons with disabilities, and housing for persons with AIDS all receive increases. The measure includes enough funding to renew Emergency Housing Vouchers created during the Covid pandemic. In addition, the bill extends the National Flood Insurance Program through September 30, 2026.

— Information about FY26 funding for the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s rural housing programs is available here. —

HOME, Community Development Block Grants, Native American housing, fair housing, and housing counseling are funded at the same levels as in FY25.

The Self-Help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP) remains at its recent $12 million level. The Rural Capacity Building program increases from $6 million in FY25 to $7 million this year.

The bill protects Continuum of Care operations while litigation continues regarding program changes HUD proposed. It directs HUD to provide one-year non-competitive renewals of CoC grants that expire in the first quarter of calendar year 2026 and then to continue the same process for each quarter in which it does not make new funding awards.

The bill’s provisions also instruct HUD to change some of its 2025 processes. For example, it requires 60-day comment periods for regulatory proposals.

The House is expected to pass the bill on January 22. The Senate should approve it during the week of January 26. The White House has said President Trump will sign it.

Table: HUD Funding Levels

 

Program ($ in millions) FY23 Final FY24 Final FY25 Final FY26 Budget FY26 House, H.R. 4552 FY26 Senate, S. 2465 FY26 Final, H.R. 7148
CDBG $3,300 $3,300 $3,300 0 $3,300 $3,100 $3,300
HOME 1,500 1,250 1,250 0 0 1,250 1,250
PRICE Manuf. Hsg. Prsrv. 225 10 10 0 0 10 0
Self-Help Hmownrshp (SHOP) 13.5 12 12 0 9 13 12
Veterans Home Rehab 1 0 0 NA 0 0 0
Rural Cap’y Bldg (RCB) 6 6 6 0 5 8 7
Tenant-Based Rental Asst. 27,600 32,387 32,387 0 35,268 37,355 38,439
     VASH 50 15 15 0 15 15 15
Project-Based Rental Asst. 13,938 16,010 16,010 0 17,127 17,804 18,143
Public Hsg. Capital Fund 3,200 3,410 3,410 0 2,286 3,200 3,200
Public Hsg. Operating Fund 5,109 5,501 5,501 0 5,000 5,087 5,024
202 Hsg. for Elderly 1,075 913 913 0 950 972 1,031
811 Hsg. for Disabled 360 208 208 0 262 265 287
State Rental Assistance Program Total for the programs to be combined in the SRAP: 58,429 31,787 NA NA NA
Native Amer. Hsg. 1,020 1,344 1,344 877 1,344 1,354 1,354
Native Hawaiian 22.3 22.3 22.3 18.3 22.3 22.3
Tribal VASH 7.5 7.5 7.5 10 10 10 10
Homeless Asst. Grants 3,633 4,051 4,051 4,024 4,158 4,530 4,417
Hsg. Oppties for Persons w/ AIDS (HOPWA) 499 505 505 505 529 529
Fair Hsg. 86 86.4 86.4 26.4 28.5 86.4 86.4
Healthy Homes & Lead Control 410 345 345 0 296 296 296
Hsg. Counseling 57.5 57.5 57.5 0 0 57.5 57.5

NA: Not Available

HUD Funding Bills Approved by Committees in House and Senate

August 1, 2025: The Appropriations Committees in both houses of Congress have passed fiscal year 2026 funding bills for the Department of Housing and Urban Development (combined with funding for the Department of Transportation). The full House and Senate have not yet considered these bills. If they do not resolve differences between their proposals for HUD and other parts of the government before FY26 begins on October 1, they will need to adopt a continuing resolution to keep the government open with funding continuing at this year’s levels.

Details of the funding levels in both bills are shown in the table above.

The House Appropriations Committee passed its bill, H.R. 4552, on July 17, with deep cuts in some HUD programs. It does not adopt the administration’s proposal to combine numerous programs into a block grant to states, but does include some of the significant cuts proposed in the administration’s budget: it would provide no funding for HOME or housing counseling, would reduce SHOP from $12 million this year to $9 million, and would drop fair housing from $86.4 million to $29.5 million. It would hold CDBG and Native American programs at current levels. It would also decrease HUD staffing by 26%.

The Senate Appropriations Committee passed its bill, S. 2465, on July 24.  In contrast to the House bill, the Senate would provide $1.25 billion for the HOME program. The Senate bill would also increase funding above this year’s levels for housing vouchers, project-based rental assistance, homeless assistance grants, Section 202 elderly housing, and Section 811 housing for people with disabilities. SHOP would be set at $13 million, up from $12 million in FY25, and the Rural Capacity Building program would receive $8 million. The bill would provide $3.1 billion for CDBG compared to this year’s $3.3 billion.

Neither the House nor the Senate would renew expiring Emergency Housing Program vouchers. The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities provides state-by-state and demographic estimates of the loss of Housing Choice Vouchers under the House and Senate Transportation-HUD proposals.

More Details Released on Administration’s Proposed HUD Funding

On May 30, 2025, the White House released more details on its fiscal year 2026 budget request. Adding to the information in the “skinny budget” from May 2, this version provides numbers for individual programs. Fiscal year 2026 begins on October 1, 2025.

Reductions to HUD Programs

HUD’s HOME and Community Development Block Grant programs would be zeroed out, along with the competitive programs that serve Native Americans, the Native Hawaiian Block Grant program, HUD’s self-sufficiency programs, and the Pathways to Removing Obstacles (PRO) Housing program. The Fair Housing Initiatives Program, which funds work by nonprofit fair housing organizations, would be defunded as well, though the Fair Housing Assistance Program would continue to support work by state and local governments.

Several other HUD programs – Tenant-Based Rental Assistance, Project-Based Rental Assistance, Public Housing, Section 202 elderly housing, and Section 811 housing for people with disabilities – would be combined into a block grant to states with reduced funding. Rental assistance would be limited to two years for able-bodied adults and a majority of it would be required to go to elders and people with disabilities.

The skinny budget indicated that “short- and medium-term housing assistance … to homeless and at-risk individuals” would also be capped at two years.

The Continuum of Care, Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS, Emergency Solutions Grants, and other homeless assistance programs would be merged into an “expanded” Emergency Solutions Grant program, which would fund state and local governments.

The budget proposes to defund HUD’s Rural Capacity Building program.

HUD’s Section 4 capacity building program, which serves both rural and urban places, would support only Habitat for Humanity under the budget. For years, Section 4 has also enabled Enterprise Community Partners and the Local Initiatives Support Corporation to assist community organizations.

HUD’s Congressional Justifications document, which explains the budget request to members of Congress, reports that FY25 appropriations can support 8,597 full-time HUD staff, while the proposed FY26 levels would provide 6,340 full-time staff, a 26 percent reduction. It is not clear whether the stated FY25 staffing levels take into account some or all of the layoffs that have been attempted in calendar year 2025.

A New CDFI Program for Rural Communities

The budget proposes a new $100 million Rural Financial Assistance Program at the Treasury Department. Community Development Financial Institutions receiving these funds would be required to use 60 percent of their awards for rural areas, with a priority to investments and loans in places with poverty rates of at least 20 percent. At least 10 percent of total program funds would be targeted to persistent poverty counties, where poverty rates have been at or above 20 percent for 30 years or more.

Although rural-serving CDFIs would benefit from the new program, the budget would eliminate funding for the existing CDFI assistance programs, including the Native CDFI programs. The skinny budget stated that “the CDFI industry has matured beyond the need for ‘seed’ money and should at this point be financially self-sustaining.” The CDFI Fund recently indicated that only Congress could eliminate any of its programs: in a response to an executive order, the Fund stated that all of its programs are required by statute.

Disaster relief through FEMA, the Small Business Administration, and USDA would be reduced. The Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) and the Community Services Block Grant would terminate.

The U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness would be eliminated, as would NeighborWorks USA (referenced by its official name, the Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation). The Appalachian Regional Commission would continue, with lower funding, but other regional commissions would end.

Next Steps

This budget represents the first step in a lengthier process to set appropriations for FY26. Both the House and the Senate will develop their own appropriations bills, which may or may not resemble the President’s proposal. The House and Senate should resolve any differences between their bills and send final versions to the President for signature by September 30. If they do not meet that deadline, a continuing resolution would be needed to keep the government running.

The House Appropriations Committee has scheduled its subcommittee markup of the HUD appropriations bill for July 14, with full committee consideration on July 17. The Senate Appropriations Committee has not released a schedule as of June 3.

The budget reconciliation bill to set future spending and tax levels is a separate process, though it could have an impact on FY26 appropriations if Congress agrees on a bill.

For ongoing news on both appropriations and reconciliation, subscribe to HAC emails, which include the free biweekly HAC News.

 

 

HAC CEO Statement on Trump Administration and Congressional Actions on Housing

President Trump’s Executive Order barring institutional investors from purchasing single-family homes was one of last week’s several welcome policy actions aimed at curtailing the affordability crisis gripping rural America. Congress also passed several bipartisan appropriations bills which, if enacted, would provide robust funding for critical programs and resources such as the US Treasury Department’s CDFI Fund, as well as several programs administered by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the US Department of Agriculture. HAC applauds the latest policy advancements toward making rural housing more affordable for renters and homebuyers all over the country.

According to the Council of Economic Advisors report, rural rents have increased 31.5 percent over the past two decades, while rural renter incomes have increased just 5.5 percent in the same span of time. Additionally, HAC research shows that while non-rural markets experienced a 10 percent growth in housing supply over the last decade, rural housing supply only experienced a 1 percent increase in the same span.

Both this week’s Executive Order, and the advances made in Congress, are steps in the right direction, and could ultimately lead to powerful tools in the fight against the rural housing affordability crisis. HAC also believes that the affordability crisis in rural America requires a sustained and intentional effort using proven existing tools. While Congress has made welcome progress, funds for several critical programs have yet to be distributed to applicants who are working daily to help low-income rural renters and homeowners.  HAC looks forward to working with the Administration and the dedicated career employees at HUD, Treasury, and USDA, to ensure that this backlog, as well as newly appropriated fiscal 2026 funds, are brought to bear urgently on the housing challenges faced by rural Americans.

HAC’s 2026 Rural Housing Policy Priorities

For over 50 years, the Housing Assistance Council (HAC) has been the voice for the poorest of the poor in the most rural places. Our deeply rooted work in communities across the country informs our research and drives our policy positions. Our independent and non-partisan work with members of Congress, federal agencies, affordable housing and community development organizations, and other stakeholders ensures the most vulnerable rural populations – especially those in high-needs regions like the Mississippi Delta, rural Appalachia, farmworker communities, the Southwest border colonias, and Indian Country – have improved access to safe and affordable housing opportunities.

Rural America is home to about 20 percent of the U.S. population and covers more than 90 percent of the U.S. landmass. Its small towns and rural regions are demographically and economically varied and face a wide array of local challenges and opportunities for developing their communities and housing. While each place is unique, HAC has documented several themes. Persistent poverty is a predominantly rural condition. Habitable rural housing is in severely short supply. The adequate housing that does exist is often unaffordable because rural incomes are low and run well below the national median. Rural housing lacks adequate plumbing and kitchen facilities at a rate above the national average. Overcrowding is not uncommon in some rural regions. Decades of stagnant rural house prices have denied owners the wealth and mobility so often associated with buying a home. Complicating these challenges, a lack of reliable rural data obscures rural realities.

In addressing these issues, HAC’s policy priorities include:

  1. Building the capacity of local affordable housing and community development organizations deeply rooted in rural places;
  2. Expanding access to credit and safe, affordable lending in rural communities;

We invite you to view our 2026 Policy Priorities and explore the various policy issues facing rural communities. You can also access an Executive Summary of the Policy Priorities.

 

HAC’s Policy Priorities for 2026

 

HAC CEO Applauds Markup of Housing Supply Package, Urges Further Bipartisan Action to Address Rural Housing Affordability Crisis

On December 16 and 17, 2025, the House Financial Services Committee marked up the Housing for the 21st Century Act, a package of housing supply reforms. This package came together in response to the Senate Banking Committee’s ROAD to Housing Act package, which passed in the Senate earlier this year but has not been considered in the House.

“This package of housing supply modernizations is a welcome example of bipartisan compromise in a challenging policy environment,” said David Lipsetz, President & CEO of the Housing Assistance Council. “Rural communities need more housing and passing this bill will help. But we would be remiss if we didn’t point out that most of the rural-specific provisions were left out of the House bill.”

The  version passed by the Senate Banking Committee over the summer included HAC’s top policy priority, the Rural Housing Service (RHS) Reform Act (S. 1260 and H.R.4957). This bill would provide the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Rural Housing Service (RHS) with new tools to address the preservation of rural rental housing; authorize successful pilot programs; modernize the single-family housing programs; and improve USDA’s internal infrastructure, technology, and reporting.

While the House removed the key RHS Reform Act provisions for preserving USDA’s flagship multifamily program (Section 515), several other provisions remained that will help rural communities in need:

  • Increased Section 504 Loan Limits: Raises the maximum that can be loaned without a mortgage from $7,500 to $15,000 for critical home repairs and expands eligibility to low-income applicants, not just very low-income applicants.
  • Annual Rural Housing Report: Requires USDA to publish transparent data on Rural Housing Service program performance.
  • Technology Modernization Study: Directs GAO to assess funding needed to modernize outdated USDA systems; current system is about 20 years old.
  • 90-Day Processing Goal: Establishes expectations for timely application review and requires reporting on delays.

“Rural housing organizations were disappointed to see USDA Section 515 multifamily preservation left on the cutting room floor during negotiations on the House package. Rural housing markets deserve better,” said Lipsetz. “We are part of a large coalition of national and local partners working to preserve the remaining 385,000 units in this deeply affordable USDA portfolio. Appropriators have started to provide the necessary tools and flexibilities on a pilot basis. Now we need the multifamily provisions of the RHS Reform Act to execute a long-term preservation strategy that keeps these rural families in good quality rental housing.”

Between 2013 and 2023, rural areas experienced only an estimated 1 percent overall increase in their housing stock compared to a 10 percent increase for non-rural areas. Measuring the change in housing units includes two components: 1) new homes – housing units added between 2013 and 2023; and 2) lost stock – the decrease in homes built in earlier periods. This basic analysis reveals that rural areas experienced a relatively minor increase in new homes constructed over the 10-year period. But simultaneously, there was a substantial reduction in the existing rural housing stock. Homes built before 2013 declined by 6.5 percent in rural counties, compared to only a 1.6 percent decline for non-rural areas. To learn more, read HAC’s latest issue of Rural Voices, which is focused on rural housing supply, and read HAC’s comments for the record for the House Financial Services Committee’s recent housing supply hearing.

HAC Opposes Proposed Changes to ECOA Equal Lending Rule

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has proposed to change its rules for the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, which requires fairness in lending, including mortgage lending. The revisions would eliminate use of disparate impact — the legal concept that conduct is discriminatory if it has inequitable effects, even if there was no intent to discriminate — and would revise provisions on discouragement of applicants or prospective applicants and on special purpose credit programs. HAC’s response argues that disparate impact is a necessary tool to identify discrimination in mortgage lending, including discrimination against rural residents.

CFPB ECOA disparate impact HAC Final

HAC Comments on Rural Housing Supply

The House Financial Services Committee held a hearing December 3, 2025 titled Building Capacity: Reducing Government Roadblocks to Housing Supply. HAC submitted written comments to the committee, pointing out that rural areas are lagging in development of new housing. HAC also reminded lawmakers that preservation of existing housing is essential to provide an adequate housing supply, and that rural places face a rental housing preservation crisis.

HAC Comments for the Record on Housing Supply for HFSC Hearing 12.03.25

Final USDA Housing Funds for FY26 are Close to FY25 Levels

Update, November 14, 2025: USDA is one of several government entities that received appropriations for all of fiscal year 2026 in the compromise legislation that ended the federal government shutdown after a record 43 days. (The Department of Veterans Affairs, military construction, and the legislative branch also got funding for the full year.) Most agencies, including HUD, will continue to be funded at fiscal year 2025 levels through January 30, 2026, and then will need another continuing resolution or full-year appropriations.

— HAC’s post about the FY26 budget for HUD and some other housing finance programs is available here. —

The final agreement increases Section 502 direct homeownership loans to $1 billion rather than the $880 million provided in FY24 and FY25. Like most other rural housing and community facilities programs, however, Section 502 direct remains at levels below those of FY23, as shown in the table below.

The measure enlarges the demonstration program that allows some Section 521 Rental Assistance contracts to be decoupled from expiring Section 515 mortgages. In FY26 USDA can continue to support up to 5,000 RA units for tenants in properties where Section 515 mortgages have ended.

The continuing resolution/appropriations bill also provides full back pay for federal workers who were not paid during the shutdown. It cancels layoffs the administration announced during the shutdown, including the RIFs of all CDFI Fund staff and over 400 HUD employees, and prohibits further RIFs until after January 30. In addition, it extends the Farm Bill through September 30 and the National Flood Insurance Program through January 30.

Table: USDA Rural Housing Service Funding Levels

Program ($ in millions) FY23 Final FY24 Final FY25 Final* FY26 Budget FY26 House, H.R. 4121 FY26 Senate, S. 2256 FY26 Final
502 SF Direct Loans $1,250 $880 $880 0 $880 $1,000 $1,000
     Nat. Amer. SF Demo 7.5 5 5 0 6 5 5
502 SF Guar. Loans 30,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
504 VLI Repair Loans 28 25 25 25 25 25 25
504 VLI Repair Grants 32 25 25 20 *** 25 21
515 MF Direct Loans 70 60 60 50 60 50 50
514 Farm Labor Hsg. Loans 20 15 15 11 15 15 15
516 Farm Labor Hsg. Grants 10 7.5 7.5 6.2 7.5 7.5 6
521 Rental Asst. 1,488 1,608 1,608 1,715 1,715 1,715 1,715
523 Self-Help TA 32 25 25 0 20 25 25
533 Hsg. Prsrv. Grants 16 10 10 0 ** 10 6
538 MF Guar. Loans 400 400 400 400 400 400 400
542 Vouchers 48 48 48 0 48 48 48
Rental Prsrv. Demo (MPR) 36 34 34 15 30 34 30
Rental Prsrv. TA 2 1 1 0 0 2 2
Rural Cmty. Dev’t Init. 6 5 5 0 6 5 5
Cmty. Facil. Direct Loans 2,800 2,800 2,800 1,250 1,000 1,250 1,250
Cmty. Facil. Grants 25 5 5 0 *** 5*** 13***
Tribal Colleges CF Grants 10 8 8 0 8 8 8
Cmty. Facil. Guar. Loans 650 650 650 650 650 650 650

Abbreviations key

    • NA: Not Available
    • MF: Multifamily (Rental)
    • SF: Single-Family (Homeownership)
    • TA: Technical Assistance
    • VLI: Very Low-Income

* A full-year continuing resolution (CR), signed into law on March 15, 2025, funds the federal government through September 30, the end of fiscal year 2025. The CR provides flexibility for USDA to move funds among Rural Development programs to make their funding levels as near as possible to the levels in FY24, and specifically instructs the department to transfer $34 million from other RD programs to Section 521 Rental Assistance. The CR instructs agencies to submit plans to Congress by late April showing how they will divide their appropriated funds among programs, but USDA’s plan seems not to be publicly available. This table assumes that all programs have the same funding in FY25 as in FY24, although that may not be the case.

** The bill would provide $20 million for Section 504 grants and Section 533 grants combined.

*** The Community Facilities grants program amounts shown here exclude earmarked amounts. The final FY25 appropriation designates just over $659 million in CF grants funding for earmarks.

 

 

UPDATE, August 5, 2025: The full Senate passed a fiscal year 2026 funding bill for USDA on August 1. Like the version that has passed the House Appropriations Committee, the Senate’s measure rejects many of the cuts proposed by the administration’s budget. Details are in the table below.

The full House has not yet considered its bill, and Congress is on recess until after Labor Day. Before September 30, the House should pass a bill, the House and Senate should resolve any differences between their bills, and the final version should be signed by the president. If they do not meet that deadline, a continuing resolution would be needed to keep all or part of the government running. For updates, subscribe to HAC emails, which include the free biweekly HAC News.

The Senate bill would raise Section 502 direct funding to $1 million, higher than the $880 million that has been appropriated in the last two years and is again proposed by the House. It would also hold the Section 523 self-help program at $25 million, above the $20 million proposed by the House. The administration would have eliminated support for both Section 502 direct and self-help.

Like the House and the administration, the Senate would set Section 521 Rental Assistance at $1.715 billion to support current tenants. The Senate bill would drop Section 515 to $50 million rather than $60 million, but would hold Section 514/516 farm labor housing loans and grants at their current levels. It would provide steady funding for vouchers and the MPR preservation program as well. Technical assistance for rental preservation would receive an increase to $2 million.

The bill also eliminates funding for the Rural Partners Network initiative, according to the Senate majority’s press release on the bill, and maintains “Buy America” provisions requiring the use of domestic products.

The House draft and the administration’s budget are early steps in the process of setting appropriations for FY26. Both the House and the Senate will develop their own appropriations bills, which may or may not resemble the President’s proposal. The House and Senate should resolve any differences between their bills and send final versions to the President for signature by September 30. If they do not meet that deadline, a continuing resolution would be needed to keep the government running.

The budget reconciliation bill to set future spending and taxation levels is a separate legislative process, though it could have an impact on FY26 appropriations if Congress agrees on a bill.

 

UPDATE: On June 23, the House Appropriations Committee approved H.R. 4121, its bill to fund USDA for FY26. The bill’s provisions related to rural housing and community facilities were the same as those included in the June 4 draft.

On June 4, the House Appropriations Committee released its draft funding bill for the U.S. Department of Agriculture for fiscal year 2026, which begins on October 1, 2025. A subcommittee will mark up the bill on June 5, and the full House committee will review it on June 11. The Senate Appropriations Committee has not yet released a draft bill or a markup schedule.

The White House’s FY26 budget request was published only a few days earlier, on May 30, providing numbers for individual programs that were not all included in the “skinny budget” issued on May 2.

The House draft bill proposes funding levels very similar to those in FY24/25, whereas the administration’s budget requests significant funding cuts. Details are provided in the table below.

USDA Homeownership Programs

The House bill would maintain the Section 502 direct and guarantee programs at their current levels, but would drop Section 523 self-help from $25 million this year to $20 million. The budget would eliminate funding for a number of USDA housing programs, including the Section 502 direct mortgage program and the Section 523 self-help program.

USDA Rental Housing Programs

Most of the rental housing programs would remain at current funding levels under the House bill, although it would reduce the Multifamily Preservation and Revitalization Program from $34 million this year to $30 in FY26. The administration’s budget, on the other hand, would reduce funding for Section 515 rental housing loans, Section 514/516 farm labor housing loans and grants, and MPR.

The administration’s budget would provide no funds for the Section 542 voucher program. Ending these vouchers has been proposed in the past – for example, last year’s budget request for FY25 would not have funded new USDA vouchers but it included funds to renew existing USDA vouchers. (Since the final appropriation for FY25 was a continuing resolution based on FY24 funding, it did provide money for new vouchers as well as renewals.) The FY26 budget, however, would not provide ongoing support for current voucher holders. According to a USDA budget summary, “the majority of the legacy voucher holders will be able to adjust without the continued assistance, or with alternative local, state and Federal programs.”

Both the House and the administration would protect some tenants in properties whose Section 515 or 514 loans end by “decoupling” Rental Assistance from Section 515 loans. USDA is currently running a demonstration program for such Stand-Alone Rental Assistance. The House would maintain current language that allows decoupled RA to be used regardless of the reason for the loan’s termination, but the budget would permit it only when a loan matures, not when the owner prepays the loan. Advocates have suggested it is inappropriate to continue RA when owners prepay, because they are required to keep the units affordable for tenants who remain, even if they do not receive the ongoing subsidy from RA. The administration’s budget does not explain whether it is adopting this reasoning.

The House’s request for Section 521 Rental Assistance seems to be taken directly from the budget request. While the budget does seek an increase for RA – which would be necessary to renew existing RA units, given inflation – it is unclear whether some tenants may lose RA. The official budget document says that amount is “for renewals of existing rental assistance contracts for maintaining a sustainable rental assistance program,” but does not explicitly say that all existing RA contracts will be renewed. A USDA Explanatory Statement says the agency expects this amount will renew about 280,000 units, but does not indicate whether that is the total number of contracts up for renewal. As this web page is posted on June 4, HAC is trying to verify the details; this page will be updated if we receive information.

The budget proposes to add language specifying that a portion of MPR preservation funds can be transferred to other programs – as is always permitted – but it would not require USDA to notify Congress before moving the funds.

USDA Rural Development Staffing

Government Executive, an independent publication, calculated that the administration’s budget would reduce USDA’s total staffing level by 22 percent. The budget document indicates that, with its requested dollar levels, USDA Rural Development staff (which includes personnel at the Rural Housing Service, the Rural Business-Cooperative Service, and the Rural Utilities Service) would fall by 31.7 percent from FY25 to FY26. It is not clear whether the stated FY25 staffing levels take into account some or all of the layoffs that have been attempted in calendar year 2025.

Technical Assistance and Other Provisions

The Rural Community Development Initiative, which provides technical assistance to rural housing and community development organizations, would receive $6 million in the House bill, but none under the administration’s budget. Neither the House nor the administration would  support technical assistance for rental preservation, community facilities, or farm labor housing.

The House bill includes a provision that has been standard in USDA appropriations for several years, requiring 10 percent of the funding for many Rural Development programs to be used in persistent poverty counties. The administration’s budget does not include that language.

The House bill would preclude USDA’s housing programs from implementing energy efficiency standards that both USDA and HUD adopted in 2024 but have not yet put into effect. The administration’s budget does not include that language.

Federal government shuts down many functions

UPDATED as of 8:00 pm Eastern time on Tuesday, October 14.

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has posted an updated version of its Frequently Asked Questions During a Lapse in Appropriations, dated October 3, 2025. Several of the questions and answers relate to treatment of government contracts and awards during a shutdown.

……………..

October 1, 2025 — With Congress unable to agree on appropriations bills or a continuing resolution, many government activities stopped at the end of September 30, the last day of fiscal year 2025. The closure is likely to last for at least several days, because the House is not scheduled to be in session until October 6. The last time this occurred, the shutdown lasted a record 35 days, from December 22, 2018 to January 25, 2019.

What activities continue: The administration determines what federal agency functions must be continued during a shutdown. Staff who carry out those essential functions, as well as staff whose positions are not funded through annual appropriations and political appointees confirmed by the Senate, are required to work during the shutdown, but are not paid until the shutdown ends. Other staff are furloughed – they do not work during the shutdown but after it ends they are paid for the time they did not work. If a shutdown lasts more than a few days, determinations of crucial tasks and needed workers may shift.

Agency RIFs: In the last week of September there was significant concern that this shutdown would lead to many federal employees losing their jobs, based on an Office of Management and Budget memo telling agencies to “consider” issuing reduction in force (RIF) notices for employees whose job funding lapsed and whose work tasks were “not consistent with the President’s priorities.”

RIFs and furloughs are different things; a furlough is a temporary layoff with back pay later, whereas a RIF terminates a job, although a RIF’d employee receives a 60-day notice and may be transferred to a different position.

Only a few federal agencies incorporated RIF plans into their shutdown contingency plans, however, and USDA and HUD were not among them. Overall, the current furloughs reportedly impact around 550,000 federal workers, 23% of the current workforce.

USDA shutdown plan: USDA’s current plan has one page devoted to Rural Development. It shows that nearly 83% of RD’s staff are furloughed, compared to 49% of the department’s total staff. “Limited” RD activities will continue, including making Section 521 Rental Assistance payments for contracts already in effect, for as long as the funding is available. RD staff have told stakeholders that available RA funds will cover the program at least until the end of October.

RD does not have authority to renew RA contracts that expire during the shutdown.

According to the plan, the agency will continue servicing loans “only as necessary to protect RD’s interest in properties.” This seems to imply what past RD plans stated explicitly – no new loans, grants, or loan guarantees would be issued during a shutdown.

HUD shutdown plan: HUD’s plan seems to indicate that almost 94% of its employees are furloughed, with 16% of them to be recalled intermittently, but that many of its programs are functioning.

Programs such as HOME, CDBG, and Continuum of Care will continue to disburse funds when funds have been obligated and no further action by HUD employees is necessary. When HUD review or action is required, the department will recall employees “as necessary to avoid an imminent threat to the safety of human life or property.”

Monthly subsidy programs such as public housing, housing choice vouchers, and multifamily assistance contracts, will continue to operate while funding is available. Unlike USDA, HUD does have the authority to renew Project-Based Rental Assistance contracts that expire during the shutdown.

The plan notes that “nearly all of HUD’s fair housing activities will cease during a lapse” in appropriations.

National Flood Insurance Program expiration: The continuing resolution that funded the government from March 15 through September 30 authorized NFIP, so the program expired after September 30. FEMA can continue to pay claims so long as it has funds available, but it must stop issuing or renewing policies.

Long-term effects: At this point, it is difficult to determine how long the current closure may last and what its long-term impacts may be. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that around 750,000 workers could be furloughed every day of the shutdown, with the daily cost of their compensation totaling roughly $400 million.

……………

NOTE: As of mid-afternoon Eastern time on September 29, 2025, HAC could find no new information about what might happen to rural housing programs in the event of a federal government shutdown. If we receive any news we will post it here.

…………….

Follow HAC’s reporting on appropriations in the HAC News (subscribe here) and on our web pages for USDA and HUD funding.

Federal agencies are required to prepare contingency plans identifying which functions will continue during a government shutdown and which will not. The summary below is based on the most recent plans posted online for USDA, HUD, and the Treasury Department. All of them were prepared during the Biden administration. USDA’s January 2024 shutdown plans are still online, while HUD’s and Treasury’s plans have been removed and not replaced. OMB’s shutdown page refers readers to individual agencies. OMB’s September 2023 FAQs remain online.

A brief federal government shutdown probably would not impact most people who receive housing assistance but, at some point after the first few days, the housing effects would begin to be noticeable. In fiscal year 2019, a record 35-day shutdown from December 22, 2018 to  January 25, 2019 led some owners of USDA-financed rental properties, unaware that the agency had enough Section 521 Rental Assistance (RA) funding to last through January, to threaten to evict tenants who could not pay full rent on their own. Fortunately, Congress reached a funding agreement before any RA renewals were missed that February. (More details about the 2019 shutdown are included at the end of this post.)

KEY TAKEAWAYS

  • A brief federal government shutdown probably would not impact most people who receive housing assistance but, at some point after the first few days, the housing effects would begin to be noticeable.
  • Section 521 Rental Assistance disbursements would continue, but not until the 30th day of a shutdown, and only if funding is available, according to USDA Rural Development’s shutdown plan, dated January 2024.
  • No new rural housing loans, grants, or loan guarantees would be committed during a shutdown.
  • HUD’s monthly subsidy programs – including public housing operating subsidies, housing choice vouchers, and multifamily assistance contracts – would operate only while funding remained available, according to HUD’s September 2023 contingency plan. If they ran out of money during a shutdown, they would cease to operate.

WHAT SHUTS DOWN

USDA Rural Development

Rural Development’s contingency plan, dated January 2024, indicates that State Directors, their staff, and some employees in the Washington, DC national office and the Customer Servicing Center in St. Louis would continue working during a shutdown.

Rental Assistance

RD’s plan says that Section 521 Rental Assistance would continue “only … if a threat to RD’s property interests becomes imminent (day 30) …, and funding remains available under existing rental assistance agreements. … On and after the 30th calendar day of a funding lapse, RD will assign the minimum number of employees needed to disburse Rental Assistance payments, pursuant to the exception for the protection of property (RD’s security interest), on the presumption that, after 30 days, the threats to RD’s property will have become and will continue to be imminent.”

The amount needed for RA can vary considerably from month to month. The RA payments each month are for the RA contracts that expired during that month, and each payment obligates a full year of RA funding. For example, the RA contracts that expired during November 2024 and were renewed in late November or early December will not be impacted again until they expire in November 2025.

The contingency plan does not have a provision – which was included in a previous version – stating that, if the agency has used up all its RA funds, “additional servicing options” could be provided to rental properties. In 2019, for example, USDA was considering permitting owners to use project reserves to cover costs. That shutdown ended before the agency completely ran out of RA money, so they did not have to decide whether to allow the use of reserves.

Loans, grants, and servicing

According to USDA’s contingency plan, no new loans or grants would be committed during a shutdown. No new loan guarantees would be issued under any of the housing programs or the community facilities program. For Section 502 guaranteed loans only, lenders and borrowers could choose to proceed with closing if USDA had already issued a valid conditional commitment. The lender would be assuming the risk until the shutdown ended and a guarantee was issued.

RD activities that are considered necessary to preserve the government’s property would continue during a shutdown, and loans and escrow accounts are considered to be government property. Therefore RD would keep processing nightly updates for each RD financial system, making insurance and tax payments from borrowers’ escrow accounts, and “reconciling and submitting for initial processing” collection activity including amortized payments and payoff activity. Some foreclosure sales would go forward. Servicing of existing guaranteed loans would continue, including processing loss claims.

Disbursements of construction loans and grants would continue during a shutdown.

HUD

HUD’s plan is dated August 2023. It explains that, since 2019, appropriations language has allowed HUD’s salaries and expenses funding to be carried over into the next fiscal year. The plan explains that funds remaining from an expired continuing resolution – such as the CR that ends on December 20 – cannot be used for new obligations. The department’s senior leadership would decide how much of that funding to use and for what functions.

Programs operating with HUD funding that was obligated before a shutdown would continue to operate. Much of the Federal Housing Administration’s and Ginnie Mae’s work would continue during a shutdown. Monthly subsidy programs, however – including public housing operating subsidies, housing choice vouchers, and multifamily assistance contracts – would operate only while funding remained available. If they ran out of money during a shutdown, they would cease to operate.

Treasury

The Treasury Department’s plan, dated September 2023, states that the CDFI Fund’s programs would not operate during a shutdown, without providing any further details.

WHO KEEPS WORKING

Generally, during a shutdown, federal staff in the affected agencies do not work unless their functions are considered essential. Furloughed employees are also not allowed to do their jobs voluntarily while the government is closed. In the past, Congress and the President have usually agreed to pay furloughed employees retroactively after a shutdown ends, but they are not required to do so.

Presidential appointees (i.e., agency officials who were confirmed by the Senate) are not furloughed. They are not paid, however, unless funds for their salaries are appropriated after the shutdown ends. “Schedule C” employees, also known as political appointees (these jobs do not require Senate confirmation), are subject to the same rules as civil service employees to determine whether their roles are essential during a shutdown.

WHAT A SHUTDOWN MEANS FOR GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS

A 2023 Office of Management and Budget document explains that during a shutdown a federal contractor can proceed with work that is not impacted by the lapse in funding. For example, if an agency has already obligated funds representing the entire price under a contract or task order before the funding lapse began, the contractor can conduct the work. At the agency, however, routine operational and administrative activities relating to contract or grant administration cannot continue.

WHAT HAPPENED IN FY19

Fiscal year 2019 began on October 1, 2018 with parts of the federal government, including USDA and HUD, open under continuing resolutions. After a final CR expired, they did close down on December 22. The government reopened on January 25, 2019, under another CR that expired on February 15. A final consolidated appropriations act was signed into law by President Trump on February 15.

USDA Rural Development

The first HAC News issue after the shutdown began, published on January 15, 2019, reported that limited functions were continuing at USDA’s national office in Washington, DC and the Customer Service Center in St. Louis. Loan closings were not taking place and applications were not being processed.

Rental Assistance

USDA RD was able to renew Section 521 Rental Assistance contracts that expired in December and January. If the shutdown had continued, however, the agency would not have had enough money to renew the approximately 700 RA contracts that expired in February and 1,000 in March.

By January 25, 2019, when a deal was reached for a three-week CR, the HAC News reported that USDA was considering short-term measures, such as allowing owners to use project reserves to cover costs, but had not yet finalized any plans or notified property owners/managers. The need for providing information directly from USDA had become clear when managers of USDA-financed properties in Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, and Mississippi sent notices to tenants telling them their RA was ending in January and they would be responsible for paying their full rent, then backpedaled when informed by USDA the RA would be paid.

After the shutdown ended, the February 11, 2019 HAC News quoted a notice USDA sent to owners and managers of USDA-financed properties with Section 521 Rental Assistance: “We are pleased to inform you that Rental Assistance for Section 514/515 properties has been obligated through April. … We understand that the most recent lapse in appropriations created anxiety and uncertainty regarding the status of your contract obligations. We are hopeful that this communique and the fact that all contracts are obligated through April will provide you reassurance and operational predictability in your management of these critical low-income resources throughout rural America. Thank you for your partnership in delivering the Rural Housing Service affordable housing mission.”

A January 2019 memo from the National Housing Law Project explained the rights of federally assisted tenants during the government shutdown. NHLP is preparing an updated memo for a possible October 2023 shutdown.

Homeownership Programs

On February 1, 2019, after the shutdown ended, USDA’s single-family programs office announced it would issue new Certificates of Eligibility to all Section 502 direct applicants who had valid COEs on December 21 before the government shut down. The agency did not have enough money to obligate additional Section 502 direct loans until it received funding beyond February 15, however.

Section 504 repair loans and grants were available on February 1. USDA planned to prioritize applicants with immediate health and safety hazards.

Other Impacts

There were additional housing-related impacts from the FY19 shutdown, and only a few are summarized below.

Some HUD Project-Based Rental Assistance contracts expired early in the shutdown, as reported in the January 15, 2019 HAC News. About 21,500 households with average incomes under $13,000 per year were impacted by the expiration of 650 PBRA contracts that ended in December. More were expiring in January and February and HUD would need to determine whether it had funds available to renew them. Property owners could use their reserves, if available, to cover shortfalls. Public housing capital funding was unavailable, and operating funds would not be able to carry public housing authorities beyond February.

The shutdown’s effect in Indian Country was “substantial and unique,” the Center for Indian Country Development at the Minneapolis Federal Reserve reported, although calculating a dollar amount was not possible. Because of the unique relationship between the U.S. and Tribes, Tribal services are often closely tied to federal funding. Government employment is disproportionately high in Indian Country, Tribal staff such as those who plow reservation roads were furloughed, and Tribal education funds were in danger.

Disaster spending, particularly funding for Puerto Rico’s recovery from Hurricane Maria in 2017, was also delayed by the 2019 shutdown. Congress had appropriated $20 billion in CDBG-DR funds for Puerto Rico, but only $1.5 billion of that money was approved before the shutdown, and HUD did not disburse it during the shutdown. HUD approval of disaster spending plans or amendments from California, Florida, Georgia, Missouri and the U.S. Virgin Islands was also put on hold.

 

HAC CEO Applauds Rural LIHTC Equity Investment Announcement

On August 5, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) announced that the government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, can now each double their annual investment in Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) to $2 billion. In addition, FHFA is requiring one-half of their total $4 billion annual investment be invested in difficult to serve housing markets and of that $2 billion 20 percent ($400 million) be for housing in rural markets. The Housing Assistance Council (HAC) applauds this move and the significant impact that it will have on driving affordable housing investment to otherwise underserved small town and rural America.

“LIHTC is the biggest driver of affordable housing development in the country, but rural communities often struggle to access a fair and equitably priced share of LIHTC equity,” said David Lipsetz, President and CEO of HAC. “Twenty percent of our country’s population lives in rural places, so we applaud FHFA Director Pulte for requiring that a proportionate amount of GSEs’ LIHTC equity investments in difficult to serve markets target small town and rural America.”

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 imposed on the GSEs a Duty to Serve obligation to facilitate a secondary market for mortgages on housing for low- and moderate-income families in three underserved markets: rural housing, manufactured housing, and affordable housing preservation. Starting in 2017, FHFA permitted Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to reenter the LIHTC market as equity investors, bringing LIHTC investments into their Duty to Serve activities. But until now, no specific set-aside existed for LIHTC investments in Duty to Serve rural markets.

“Over the past half century, federal housing policy—indeed federal policymaking writ large–has been designed with urban and suburban economies at its center,” noted Lipsetz. “Fannie and Freddie have played a positive role building wealth and opportunity through housing, but their business model falters with the low volumes and smaller loans that characterize most rural housing markets. Similarly, LIHTC works most seamlessly in multifamily projects of a size and income-mix that differ from the stock typical of rural communities. In this context, rural America only sees a fair share of investment when national leaders put a finger on the scale. HAC appreciates Director Pulte doing exactly that with regard to the GSEs’ Duty to Serve.”

“Today’s announcement comes on the heels of the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which permanently expanded the 9 percent LIHTC allocation, but failed to include bipartisan priorities that would have leveled the playing field for rural and Tribal areas,” noted Lipsetz. “Adding a Difficult Development Area (DDA) designation to rural and Tribal would have provided a 30 percent basis boost that makes full the value of the credits in these underserved areas. Nor did the bill align Opportunity Zone (OZ) and LIHTC ‘substantial improvement’ standards to allow these programs to work well together to preserve and repair rural homes.”

“HAC hopes Congress will build on FHFA’s important action today and finish the job of making the nation’s largest housing and community development tax subsidies work just as well in small towns and rural places nationwide.”

Click here to see how HAC’s Loan Fund has helped our partners combine LIHTC equity and other resources to create and preserve rural affordable housing.

HAC CEO Applauds Markup of Bipartisan Senate Housing Legislation

Housing Assistance Council (HAC) CEO David Lipsetz Applauds Markup of Bipartisan Senate Housing Legislation

The Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Committee announced a markup of a broad, bipartisan housing bill on July 29. The ROAD to Housing Act of 2025 includes legislation from members across the committee, including several rural priorities.

“HAC applauds Chairman Scott and Ranking Member Warren for their remarkable work on the ROAD to Housing Act,” said David Lipsetz, President and CEO of HAC. “Housing is the largest monthly expense for American families, and the housing affordability crisis is as urgent in small town and rural America as in the nation’s cities and suburbs. That’s why it’s so important that the Committee is moving legislation forward on a comprehensive and bipartisan basis.”

The ROAD to Housing Act includes several bills that HAC has been supportive of, most significantly the Rural Housing Service Reform Act, led by Senators Smith (D-MN) and Rounds (R-SD). This bill would provide the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Rural Housing Service (RHS) with new tools to address the preservation of its critical multifamily portfolio; authorize successful pilot programs; modernize the single-family housing programs; and improve USDA’s internal infrastructure, technology, and reporting.

“We are especially pleased that the bill centers the housing needs of rural communities and the essential role in addressing them played by the USDA’s rural housing programs,” noted Lipsetz. “In addition to the RHS Reform Act, the bill includes important provisions to improve program coordination and align regulatory action across USDA, Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and Department of Veterans Affairs housing programs.”

Over the last several years, members of the Banking Committee have been crafting commonsense, bipartisan legislation to improve our federal affordable housing response, and many of these bills have been wrapped into the ROAD to Housing Act for this markup. HAC is glad to see the committee taking this action.

Bill text and a section-by-section summary can be seen here.

GET THE HAC NEWS!

Sign-up for HAC information products

SIGN UP HERE

Housing Assistance Council   |  1828 L Street. N.W., Suite 505, Washington, D.C. 20036
(202) 842-8600 (202) 347-3441 hac@ruralhome.org |

Board Portal

HAC is an equal opportunity provider, employer, and lender. | Civil Rights | Privacy